Since SCHIP was last funded, have health care prices increased or decreased?

Question

I understand the increase was due to higher and higher medical costs. It costs more to provide the same coverage.

So keeping the costs flat will kick off poor kids, and the $80,000 family was just spin, since the states have to get permission from the Feds to increase eligibility, anyway.

The approval of $80,000 family WAS ALWAYS POSSIBLE.
This was not part of the change. It is also hugely unlikely that either a state govt would request that high of a level or the federal govt would allow it,

Answer 1

They're liars, plain and simple. And they attack 12 year old injured kids for calling them on it.

Answer 2

Spin is ignoring the fact that Bush and the Republicans were going to increase the funding to S CHips. There goes your argument about children being kicked off. What the democrats wanted to do is to increase the number of people on S Chips and of course increase the cost. That 80,000 dollar family is not spin, it is already fact in New York.

Read this! It was not unlikely, it was being done. 14 different states already had permission to raise the levels and New York was at 80,000 dollars.

Answer 3

Bush has increased SCHIP funding 184% since he has been President.

So it has more than kept pace with rising health care cost.

The percentage of children in poverty who have health insurance, has went down each of the last 7 years.

You can verify that at the US census if you wish.

If providing schip funding to families making $82,000 per year, is so unimportant, then why was it added to the Schip bill, over Bush's objections ?

Why did the bill that was vetoed, also include language allowing some people up to age 25 to be covered ?

Bush publicly stated that he wanted to increase SCHIP funding, for poor children,

So why then did the Democrats add the non poor provisions to the bill, knowing it would be vetoed ?

This is another example, of pure partisan politics.

The Republicans started the SCHIP program in the first place.

Why are the democrats , now trying to act like, it was all thier idea to begin with?

Answer 4

Medicare is for poor kids. The working poor is cover under the original SCHIP. The 80K family is not a spin.

I am not a party hack. I do read the bills. The waivers can be granted because the way the federal civil servants work.

Answer 5

The Democrats scent blood and think of the Republicans and Bush will come for the time of as susceptible and anti-new child in this situation. For a solid many people who do no longer seem previous the headlines this tactic will paintings and the Democrats will %. up some votes. For some people who think of that's an attack on credibility it would desire to point some Democrats who could are growing to be to be their vote won't get it because of the fact an identical brush will paint the full occasion. i'm so ill of politics. i visit vote in the subsequent election yet i might desire to might desire to hold my nostril as quickly as I do it.

Answer 6

Poor children are covered by Medicaid and all are cared for! SCHIP is for people above the poverty line. How far above that line would people go? No socialized medicine!

Answer 7

I don't think it went up as much as they are saying remember the stories about $400.00 hammers, and $200.00 slippers,$100.00 asprin tablet?

Answer 8

They probably haven't gone up 7X though. Why couldn't the Dems just put in for two or three times as much instead of seven?

Answer 9

#1, the President's proposal did not keep the funding "flat".

#2, $80K is not spin. Just read the bill for yourself.

Answer 10

Another one that refuses to actually read the bill.