English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Dems planned to fund SCHIP by raising taxes on cigarettes.

If the Dems saw this as a way of getting people off of cigarettes, why aren't they raising the cigarette tax anyway?

2007-10-19 02:37:10 · 6 answers · asked by junglejoe 2 in Politics & Government Politics

Why didn't Dems raise taxes on all taxpayers? Were they afraid to?

2007-10-19 02:38:07 · update #1

6 answers

I smoke, but that's my problem. And yes, cigs should be taxed to help pay for healthcare....since tobacco is responsible for many severe and costly health problems.

BUT...just like in Canada, if gov't continues to hike taxes of "sin" products... a black market could start.

2007-10-19 02:43:06 · answer #1 · answered by Villain 6 · 4 3

Good point! I smoke, and under the bill I would be eligible to receive free health care (I'm 24 and make plenty, but am still considered "poor" by the bill). I never thought of it that way....making people think they are getting something for free, but taxing something that they do to fund it. I'm glad the bill failed.

2007-10-19 02:45:22 · answer #2 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 2 2

That seems a silly way to fund something. Tax a product until everyone stops using it? How do we then fund it if there are no taxes being collected on that product any longer? Short sighted as usual........

2007-10-19 02:42:11 · answer #3 · answered by Brian 7 · 2 3

the wealthy already pay for approximately 70 to eighty % of the sequence, of taxes each and every 3 hundred and sixty 5 days. What greater do you prefer? Maby your self, and different Democrats might desire to initiate giving back your government welfare tests. maximum Democrats do no longer comprehend that the united statesauthorities has NO money. in no way has. they're based on tax payers money, they carry at the same time, then in return, spend foolishly. So technically, lots of the money it is accumulated, is given back to the human beings. only no longer in the present day. the money might desire to be surpassed back to the tax payer, somewhat then being paid for condoms, for city voters. Who won't in any respect use them. because of the fact they're attempting to come out as many little ones as they are able to. To obtain greater tax payers money. so as that they are able to waist the tax payers money on unlawful ingredients, weapons, autos, *bling, etc. somewhat then utilising the money for solid utilization, including, feeding their hungry households. usa decrease instructions have been doing this for years. constantly observing the loose government hand downs. How do i be attentive to this? i take advantage of to stay in the initiatives. yet they i've got been given some experience in me, study different the Republican books. Now I guess i make greater then maximum Democrats. and that i'm a prod Republican. The decrease instructions placed us into this financial crises. by skill of their greed on attempting to be based on government bail outs. doing away with loans, "owing to the 1994 bill that grew to become into exceeded, by skill of the Clinton administration", that enabled anybody to be waiting to take out loans. Even the decrease instructions, who heavily isn't waiting to pay them back. combating, "weak credit". They used those loans, to purpose to purchase them selves greater advantageous autos, and homes, and *bling. while they might desire to be feeding their households. Democrats might desire to initiate contributing, and end complaining. initiate gifting away their properties, and autos, "that the prosperous and better center class paid for", back to the government, to pay off this debt. After that, they might desire to then get off their rear ends. initiate examining the Republican books, and only even atemp to initiate turning their existence around, by skill of working clever, and not easy for their money, somewhat than place self assurance in government help. Oh wait, maximum Democrats won't be able to study. I forgot.

2016-10-13 04:21:45 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

strawman

2007-10-19 02:46:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

They are forcing them to get "back alley smokes"

SCOUNDRELS!

2007-10-19 02:40:19 · answer #6 · answered by Major Deek 2 · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers