Because perfect Republican values trump Christian ones.
Here's one lie from Coulter: "Jews believe that my savior, a Jew, was a raving lunatic"
2007-10-19 00:01:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
1) no such thing as the perfect Christian among human beings
2) who says she is bearing false witness?
2007-10-19 00:30:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
She bears true witness against all those who are not Christians, witnessing for Jesus Christ who is ready and willing to save them from eternal damnation. This is a perfect example of "Love your neighbor as yourself".
2007-10-19 06:17:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by dogge 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do no longer care approximately Ann Coulter... the greater she opens her mouth the greater beside the point she is. Who even gets mad at her now? She is only too greater than a number of a shaggy dog tale to be stricken anymore. She style of jogs my memory of a political Joan Rivers who is going greater for the snicker than even understanding what she says... she only needs interest that undesirable. i in my opinion am sorry for her now...
2016-10-13 04:10:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
First, there are no "perfect Christians", just forgiven.
Second, when has she beared false witness and to whom?
You really need to be a little more specific rather than throw out innuendos.
2007-10-18 23:57:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by labdoctor 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Ann is no Christian.She is an extremely intelligent businesswoman,who has no corporation to answer to.she is a freelancer.It benefits her to stir controversy.I am quite sure she is atheist,pandering to the Christians,who are majority right wing,and therefore buy her books.The comment was shock value,that's all.Ann is too intelligent to be a christian
2007-10-19 00:01:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by nobodinoze 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Well if you catch her doing this, then maybe you should give her a naughty girl spanking. I would.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-10-19 09:04:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You need to give us a specific example. It appears you are just choosing to slander the woman without anything to back it up. Sort of what you are accusing her of doing, only difference is that we have proof that you are doing it, but no proof offered by you that she has done it.
2007-10-18 23:56:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Wayne G 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
You will need to expand on this just a bit. Why don't you go after your lying congress? You will have more ammunition.
2007-10-18 23:58:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋