English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

This is a very good point. People use labels to declare what they are or what they believe they are, but neglect or avoid to search themselves down inside to find and bring to the surface their real identity.
But it takes effort and courage to do this, which is equivalent to freedem.
And as the poet said: "8eli areti ke tolmi i elef8eria".

2007-10-18 22:53:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

It is impossible to know one without knowing the other, unless you have simply not thought it through. You are "human"? Discover what Aristotle meant by "Man qua Man" and you may learn what it is to be human, which in turn will tell you "who" you are.
If you don't know who you are, HOW can you know what you are?

2007-10-19 09:37:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think I should have enough conviction and confidence in myself never to search for what I am or who I am..... it should be enough just to know who and what I want to be in my own eyes..... that would define my life well enough to lead it properly.

2007-10-19 06:43:09 · answer #3 · answered by small 7 · 1 0

It depends on who you ask. I know both what and who I am.

2007-10-19 06:07:23 · answer #4 · answered by Kingdiana Jones 7 · 0 0

ya..I'm a human but who the hell am i?
is that what you mean?
like i dont know why I'm here..what am i suppose to do..?

2007-10-19 05:47:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

WHAT WOULD BE THOUGHT ABOUT YOU?
1. Since wholes include you, you would be thought as part.
2. Since parts compose you, you would be thought as whole.
3. Since differences distinguish you, you would be thought as equivalence.
4. Since equivalences equate you, you would be thought as uniqueness.
5. Since limits limit you, you would be thought as link.
6. Since links link you, you would be thought as limit.
7. Since influences influence you, you would be thought as sensation.
8. Since sensations sense you, you would be thought as influence.
9. Since derivatives inherit you, you would be thought as origin.
10. Since origins originate you, you would be thought as derivative.
11. Since conditions condition you, you would be thought as rule.
12. Since rules rule you, you would be thought as condition.
13. Since fulfillments fulfill you, you would be thought as intent.
14. Since intents intend you, you would be thought as fulfillment.

2007-10-19 06:07:41 · answer #6 · answered by The Knowledge Server 1 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers