English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Before you answer read the LINK that shows that even bush knew Osama Bin Laden was targeting the USA

http://edition.cnn.com/2000/US/02/02/cia.terrorism/

2007-10-18 21:27:52 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Oliver North hoax
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/hoaxes/hoaxDetails.asp?HName=Osama+bin+Laden+and+Oliver+North+Email+Hoax&Page=1

2007-10-18 21:48:45 · update #1

11 answers

I do not think anyone can answer this question honestly either way.
I do feel however that had 9/11 occurred in a Gore administration we would have hunted down those responsible rather than invading an unrelated country.

Kilrai - why do you conservatives continue to spread these thoroughly debunked myths? I also notice that you never provide any source. Are we just supposed to believe your ignorant hate on your word alone?
Al Gore was not a journalist at the time. - he was elected to congress while North was still a Captain. The comments you are referring to were made to Congress during the 1987 Iran Contra hearings (Gore was not on the comittee and so was not present let alone asking questions). The man to whom North referred was Abu Nidal.
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/north.asp

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/north.asp

Neptune - thedocuments that Burger was caught with were COPIES - can't be hiding much when you leave the originals.

Koala - repeating a lie does not make it true
1993 WTC1 - 5 terrorists captured and convicted. Each serving 240 years.
1995 Riyadh - 4 suspects beheaded by Saudis before US could question them
1996 Dahran - 13 suspects indicted by US. Currently being held by our "friends" the Saudis who will not release them to us or let them be interviewed
1998 Kenya and Tanzania. 4 suspects captured and convicted - currently serving life imprisonment
1998 Clinton attempted to take out Bin Laden in Afghanistan. The Republican leadership were critical of Clinton seemingly believeing he should be spending more time answering frivilous charges regarding his personal life and less time defending our country.
2000 Cole hit 3 months before Clinton handed over to Bush. No arrests have ever been made - why did Bush not continue Clinton's excellent record of hunting down and punishing those responsible?
2001 9/11 - Bin Laden still free
2002 - Bush admits he is not even looking for Bin Laden.

We know it must be hard to be a conservative and not be thoroughly ashamed of the pathetic record of this administration. But lying about Clinton isn't the answer. Demand results from your own lad.

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/clinton.htm

2007-10-18 21:48:56 · answer #1 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 1 2

Of course, Gore is Superman and would just have put on his cape and fried the terrorists with his heat vision. Of course Clinton knew nothing of Osamas "targeting the USA" even though Ollie North told everyone 10 years before the attack. Knowledge of Osamas "targeting the USA" was ruffling the intellegence community in the first year of Clinton's first term, long before Bush even considered the presidency.

2007-10-19 05:05:11 · answer #2 · answered by Bleh! 6 · 0 0

The absurdity of the question almost does not merit a reply BUT having said that, the Poster conveniently omits the fact that under the "abomination" of the Clinton Administration
"0" was done to prevent pro-actively Islamic Terror, much less 9-11.

Why have the Far Left Wing Ultra Liberal MoveOn Democrats forgotten the Top Secret Documents "stolen" by convicted felon, Sandy Berger, who was caught with them stuffed in his pants covering up the "inaction" and lost opportunities Clinton had to arrest the problem early on i.e. the Cole incident where Slick Willy did nothing, etc. etc., and "neutralizing Osama Bin Laden when he had the chance "numerous" times!

By the way, that very same convicted felon, Sander Berger that covered for her "Sliver Tongued" over-sexed Hubby, is now advising Hillary "Lightening Rod" Clinton these days on her campaign no less.

As Slick Willy did and now his ambitious wife does and will do they "govern" by Polls.

What a legacy, "Cigars with Monica in the Oval Office"!

Now Hillary has her very own bonafide convicted felon as her campaign adviser and future "Top Secret Document Retriever", and you can bet he will be a part of her administration, God forbid should she win.

It's Payback time for Sandy's loyalty!!!

Isn't that just too too quaint!

Birds of a feather ... !!

2007-10-18 22:48:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

First, Al Gore DID win the 2000 election. 2d, if Gore were contained in the White living house on the time of the attacks, you likely can ought to verify what he did or did not do to ward off the attacks, once briefed of the probability. If he opted to do easily no longer something, as George W. Bush did, then definite, the blame would properly be placed on Al Gore.

2016-10-21 09:58:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Realistically now, it's one thing to know that an entire country is being threatened and another to know the date, time, method, and location of an attack, which you would need to actually stop one. Come on guys, do you really think that there was that kind of intel available, and that if it was that nothing was done? To do so is irrational. Hell, we ALL know that Osama Bin Laden wants to harm us, and that we are specifically targeted, but without specific, and I mean SPECIFIC details, just what exactly is supposed to be done that is not (or was not) done? Does your hatred of George Bush make you blind to reality, or is it a matter of intelligence (or the lack thereof)?

2007-10-18 21:51:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Many years ago a journalist interviewed Colonel Oliver North and asked him why he was spending millions of dollars on home security. North told the journalist that he was trying to protect his family from Osama Bin Laden who, according to North, was the biggest threat of all time and if it was up to him he'd lead a group of snipers to hunt Bin Laden down and kill him. The journalist tried to pronounce Bin Laden's name and wasn't able to do so and just laughed and laughed. That journalist's name is Vice President Al Gore.

2007-10-18 21:44:51 · answer #6 · answered by Kilrai_Wolf 2 · 4 3

No gore let osama go atleast once before 9/11 and the sheer amount of threats makes it very difficult for the cia and nsa to sort threw all of them although to have been doin a great job since 9/11

2007-10-18 21:32:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

sure GW plotted this all before he was even a canditdate and got the whole Clinton administration on board to make laws calling for regeime change in Iraq and for Osama to be arrested and placed the USS Cole in harms way ALL this and He is a moron as well............... your a sad little lad.

2007-10-18 23:34:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

huh?????
wtc one
clinton no repsonse
african embassy bomibngs
clinton no response
at least six chances to capture or kill bin laden in sudan
clinton no response

i prefer to let the results speak for themselves.

2007-10-18 23:49:29 · answer #9 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 1

9/11 would have happened anyhow- the NWO rule -- not their puppets in the White House.

2007-10-19 00:22:47 · answer #10 · answered by celvin 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers