yes, but i really don't think it will ever happen.
if they did. it would only take the first four teams in the bcs.
and they would seed them accordingly. 3 vs 2 and 4 vs 1
remember its college, and theres classes and mid terms and finals. if ever they would have playoffs....they may end up cutting the season a game or two short, start early or maybe even take out a bye week.
2007-10-18 20:59:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
even if Congress makes a decision or would not make sure, any law it tries to bypass would be rendered moot. The mere attempt by making use of legislators isn't something greater advantageous than political grandstanding. this is such as you asserting you're against international warming. useful, you're against it, yet you could not make it exchange one way or yet another. permit's say this variety of bill does bypass Congress. each and every of the NCAA might could do at that component is sue interior the legislative branch and there the belief will die. Congress might attempt to argue that the BCS is a residing, respiration violation of latest anti-have faith law yet in actual actuality there is not any violation no be counted how everyone ought to objective to spin the argument. besides the shown fact that distant the prospect must be, each and every FBS team theoretically has a large gamble to play for the call. hence, no anti-have faith regulations have been violated. And on ideal of that, there is not something to resign any FBS team from dropping all the way down to the FCS point the place playoffs are in result. back, no anti-have faith violation. it is not that i'm against a playoff however the financial certainty of the region is that the present bowl gadget with out any doubt in any admire generates greater revenues than any 8 or sixteen team playoff format ever ought to.
2016-11-08 21:59:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
With playoffs the season would end by february, we would be talking about 14-15 games if there are 3 playoff rounds. Or start the season 1 month before at the end of July which is not much better. I think it's too rough for college students.
2007-10-19 02:13:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by M. Diego 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely. It should include the top two teams from each BCS conference.
Why I say the top two teams from each conference is that this system would be the most fair way. The current system makes assumptions that in-conference losses in certain conferences shouldn't cost as much as in-conference losses to other conferences. This is obviously bias. Having at least two representatives from each conference would eliminate many "what if" questions.
The remaining four slots should be picked as "at large" entrants. This would open the door for the independents and one-year wonders from the smaller conferences.
2007-10-19 03:39:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Riggo 44 (Joe DeForest is the worst DC in history) 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's plenty of people think that there should be playoffs in college football.
There's one reason why it will never happen, and it's called money.
2007-10-18 20:38:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely. The bowl system is ridiculous.
2007-10-19 02:13:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most definitely but not just because of what happened this year. Just because EVERYWHERE else it happens.
2007-10-18 20:38:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by ALL-MAN 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO, LETS REMEMBER THIS PLAYER ARE STUDENTS FIRST
2007-10-19 00:34:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by rebshel 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do.
2007-10-18 20:50:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Steve 7
·
0⤊
0⤋