English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

No knowledge can be made on a thing that cannot be thought as "part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, and fulfillment." Why?

2007-10-18 20:26:12 · 5 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

5 answers

Because those are "cognoscendi," the objects of perception. With no objects of perception, there is no consciousness. One cannot be conscious of what does not exist.

2007-10-19 03:18:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A thing which is atomic in nature has qualia which are perceived.

An essence or Form may or may not be solely and directly based upon atomicity.

In the Platonic under-standing (hypo-thesis), direct perception of Idea links perceiver with Good, what Plotinus termed "One Mind Soul," the latter with emphasis on linkage or blending of Mind and Soul. Soul-individuation, or keeping the Word of Good, Life, thus procedes apace with under-standing.

To "make knowledge upon a thing" is an unusual construction implying gnosis. In such a usage, Pure Ego of Husserl's epoche--Plotinus' One Mind Soul-individuation--shines Rays of Light upon the bracketed atomic facticity or psychic essence, which "makes knowledge" (gnosis).

In the processional sense of Whitehead (and Hartshorne), the Dyadic agonism, eventuating victoriously, processes knowledge as sublimation-Triadic (unto further-informing Monadicity).

This is the kind of creaative fluency which Whitehead terms "transition"...which is a effectual means promoting immortal Triadicity.

It is worth noting that Brouwer's intutionism posits a move of time prior to "thinking on a thing," which process is similar to Platonic Ideation as direct under-standing or apprehension prior to Kantian mentation per concept formation from subconsciously received data stream. The Platonic is holistic, Ideational, top down, inspirational; the Kantian is bottom-up, and is what Whtiehead categorizes as concrescence.

cordially, with hope this frames this type of conceptual rigidity as locus-specific,

j.

2007-10-19 04:00:49 · answer #2 · answered by j153e 7 · 0 0

My thoughts of you are irrelevant for your continuing existence as an existent and you are not matter for the knowledge you have or don't have, you are simply matter. If you have knowledge, that is an other property you have.

2007-10-19 20:35:04 · answer #3 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 1 0

this is because of the limits of human thinking...

some things are just above our power of understanding...

for example : what are the limits of the universe and what is beyond those limits ?

scary, huh ? that is an exemplification of the notion of "infinite"

we all know what "infinite" means, but we can't really represent the notion

2007-10-19 03:43:32 · answer #4 · answered by florina 6 · 0 0

because everything including knowledge has to have a beginning and an end, a start an a finish.

2007-10-19 03:34:53 · answer #5 · answered by Al B 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers