I'd take number 2 Why? Number one trade proposal pits you with KG and Baron Davis. Good trade for KG but a bad move for Baron Davis... Baron has a long series of injuries throughout his career with him aging another year he would be more prone to injuries thus losing your fantasy season. Number two is ok because Yeah you lose a scorer in Arenas and a defensive dynamo in Camby but you got KG, who is ranking in the top 5 fantasy players, a Luol Deng who is quickly developing to all-star material and Chandler who at best resonates what Camby is doing... With this said yeah I'd go with number two.
Hope this helps.
2007-10-18 21:35:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Darth Revan 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I would go with #2 because you're getting two really good players in KG and Deng. Tyson is good for boards and blocks though he might improve a bit in points. The only thing you lose out on is assists. Though you improve tremondously in points an boards. Deng has pretty good FG % and I think KG will this year also.
I would suggest that it's good to get rid of Camby b/c he prolly will get injured and B.Davis has a history of injuries also (but when he is healthy, he is a stat filler).
At the end it depends if you need assists, but anytime you can get KG and Deng +chandler in a lopsided trade to your favor, I would do it.
2007-10-19 05:00:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Hrap 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
The second one because its like what you lose in Camby you get in Garnett and Chandler.(rebounds) What you lose in Arenas you get in Garnett and Deng.(scoring)
Arenas has played in the preseason and has not looked good if you ask me. I know he is still trying to recover from his surgery but I wouldn't want to wait until hes good AND THATS IF he can get back to playing like an all star.
Take trade 2
Garnett will give you 20 and 10 a night
Deng will give you 20 and 5 a night
Chandler will give you 10 and 10 a night
good luck
D
2007-10-19 07:23:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by D 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
I'm confused if you have Arenas, than go with the 1st trade. Although Arenas is great at scoring, KG is an overall better player in fantasy basketball. He usually averages 20+ points, 10+ rebounds, and 4+ assists. So trade for KG and Baron Davis isn't too bad either, he can help replace Arenas's scoring and I think averages more assists than him.
2007-10-19 04:04:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by micah_09 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
it's a tough one...but you are depended on the fantasy stats here,not on how a player performs...i think the 1st deal is good...you got the # 1 or 2 player in the fantasy leagues in return and got a good player in baron davis if he is healthy...on the 2nd deal, you should not let go of camby...camby is now on the peak of his career statistically speaking (good rebounds and huge amount of blocks!) and if healthy,he would definitely would give you much points on your team...i'll go with the first one...it's a fair deal anyway...hope you got this one right!
2007-10-19 07:52:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by markus_aurelus 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
only a retard would trade away camby. after 12 years in the NBA (entering the 13th), hes finally reached his prime and hes gunna b insane this year
2007-10-19 07:38:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
go for #2. chandlers is good at blocks and rebounds, deng will break out as a scorer, and kg is a double-double machine!
2007-10-19 07:31:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by jor-jor 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
#1
2007-10-19 02:58:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by none 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
1 is better but I would not give up KG...so don't take either one.
2007-10-19 03:02:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by KING 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
give up KG in a fantasy league? not unless you're getting ridiculous players in return. and i mean RIDICULOUS!!!!!!
2007-10-19 03:18:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋