English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Your honest opinion and why...

haha I just thought I would share this:
I was playing FIFA and I found the Israeli team on Europe continent????
I found it really silly, shouldn't Israel consider Middle East...it is in the Middle East region.....
It's like saying Russian shouldn't be in Asia because they are not literally Asian.

2007-10-18 18:08:02 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

uppz, typo....it should be "should the land belong to Israel OR Palestine".....not "of" Palestine lol

2007-10-18 18:17:31 · update #1

12 answers

For a long time, I thought Israel. Now, I'm not so sure. Israel's right to that land is the same as the US' right to California or Oklahoma, England's right to the Falkland Islands or Russia's right to Siberia. Unfortunately, people only have the rights they are willing and able to defend.

Placing the nation of Israel on land occupied by the Palestinians, and in the middle of hostile neighbors, has caused enormous conflict in the world. The reasonable and purdent choice, ignoring political realities, would be for Israel to relocate to another part of the world. Canada and the US have huge areas of land where Israel could develop.

Israel itself is smaller than every state, perhaps excluding Rhode Island or Delaware. Bush and Rice are pushing for a two-state solution in the Middle East. I doubt that will provide lasting peace. Israel's existence in the long term is doubtful, in my opinion. When Iran, Syria or a combination of Middle Eastern countries, is strong enough to settle the matter, they will do it.

2007-10-18 18:27:19 · answer #1 · answered by A Plague on your houses 5 · 0 0

in case you pay attention to the Arabs there is purely one answer(comparable to their WWII allies the Nazis, kill each and every of the Jews) push the Israelis into the sea.they lost the wars in 40 8,fifty 3,sixty seven,seventy 3 and nonetheless carry to this disgusting theory.i don't comprehend if this is purely their leaders or is it maximum folk of the Palestinian individuals that want to kill.yet i comprehend that they rejected a 2 state answer in 1999 and commenced the intifada instead. to no be counted if there'll ever be a peace, sooner or later while the Arabs finally lose interest of killing human beings useful there'll be a peace after all the Arabs and Jews lived in peace for some hundred years earlier the present difficulty. the claims to the land at the instant are beside the point the state of Israel exists with a colourful financial gadget,democratic governance,and a powerful militia ,and the Arabs have not something (of their own choosing)the two began on an identical time and one is loose and wealthy and the different is purely waiting for handouts. the different Arabs states considered to need it this way as they want permit the Palestinian rot in camps and supply them handout yet not adequate to stay decently and blame the Israeli for their mess

2016-11-08 21:52:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

This is not a question where your opinion matters.

It's like saying "Should Hillary be married to Bill?"

It doesn't matter because it's already settled.

The land belongs to Israel. The land has ALWAYS BELONGED to Israel.

Ther IS NO country called Palestine, There never has been.

The Palestinians have been offered their own land TWICE.

They have declined. They want to KILL ALL THE JEWS and take their land. (their words, not mine)

They are displaced persons of a very low Arabic caste. The Arab countries have refused to give them their own land since forever. The UN has offered to place them on their own land twice. They have chosen their lot in life. They are only tools used by the Arabs to attack Israel.

Now, all of YOU are participating in the next Jewish massacre.

Read your history and keep quiet about what you don't understand.

2007-10-18 18:34:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Well the other countries in the Middle East are afraid of "Jew germs" =P so they dont want the Israelis playing against them.

Though in all seriousness the land should belong to whomever wants it the most.

Life is not fair. Territory is decided not by who has the right, but by who can hold it.

2007-10-18 18:42:02 · answer #4 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 0 1

The Middle East is part of the continent of Asia. Though it is close to Africa and Europe.

As for the land, I'm sure it's not popular, but seems to me that the Palestines have been more than reasonable. OTH, if the Israelites really think God wants the land to be theirs, I have some respect for that. But, for those of us who don't believe that, it's ridiculous for them to think it should be handed over because they say so.

2007-10-18 18:14:00 · answer #5 · answered by wildeyedredhead 5 · 1 2

Decode this lyrics " If you don't know me by now"
Ever wonder who is the creator of heaven and earth?
Ever wonder after the Liberation of Freedom for the good of mankind from after world war two with the creation of peace on earth goodwill to men.
Ever wonder does the world map read Israel or Palestine?
Exodus 20.1-2, Leviticus 26.13
Ever wonder who is the landlord?
Exodus 19.5
Look around in the real world.
Who is kicking the butts of God over God's natural assets?
When we just came and passing-by in time with two empty hands will be leaving with two empty hands in time too.
Getting kick on the butts as casualty of the dead Mummy in not worshiping God.
Luke 6.39-40,41-45,46-49
What do you think?

2007-10-18 21:10:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

The two peoples must divide the land fairly.

2007-10-18 18:11:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Israel

2007-10-18 18:15:25 · answer #8 · answered by zetty 2 · 1 6

God gave the land to the Israeli's. Argue with God if you don't like it.

2007-10-18 19:02:20 · answer #9 · answered by Johnny Reb 5 · 1 3

to the winner go the spoils.

2007-10-19 17:13:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers