English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I ask this based on a question below that I can't veiw because I am blocked so I will ask a similar question.

2007-10-18 16:21:40 · 16 answers · asked by Chevalier 6 in Social Science Gender Studies

Well Gnu unlike the other asker I aimed my question at only the radical feminists and if you read the responses I got already I think you can see my point. Men have already been called pigs. So my question was real not a cheap shot.

2007-10-18 16:32:27 · update #1

First off Boots I didn't say a word about women I said feminists and that encompasses both genders and as for the term radical feminists that is a term the feminists here apparently want me to use to seperate the type that hate men from the ones that do not. When I asked a question and only said feminists I got hateful responses and now that I only mentioned the ones that hate males I get a spiteful remark. And Rosa Parks had nothing to do with feminism that was about race so maybe you are talking about things you know nothing about. I wonder if you answer all questions without thinking first.

2007-10-18 17:50:02 · update #2

Rainbow when an anti feminist say something about something bad a feminist has done you guys claim that isn't feminism but when I specify radical feminist you guys still give me guff. Feminists have destroyed my life and I am supposed to give them a break.

2007-10-19 08:36:12 · update #3

16 answers

I've noticed that most of the *men* who rely on physically abusing women are quite shorter than normal men... It seems to me, these guys have an inferiority complex and hence refer to abuses to prove how macho they are.

I've spoken with my mom, my Sister & my foster parents on this issue - and they're all in agreement (ok, so it's not exactly a study, per se).

I think it's the same with feminism - an inferiority complex whereby they have to draw negative attention to men so as to keep the focus away from their own inadequacies.

I'm one of these strange fellas who recognise both genders have issues... not just one.

2007-10-18 19:28:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Actually that question was pertaining to non-feminists women; something I believe to do with marxism and we're angry because we suffer from internal oppression. Nothing but brain games. I guess you can use the same terms for your post too.
Perhaps according to the radical feminists, you men will soon be suffering from internal oppression. Oh dear me.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AmeYzWx8QuuUYsM5ECG1NTXsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071018195308AAJRCsG&show=7#profile-info-50E8Xqrdaa
This was Gnu Sense's last post.

2007-10-18 16:47:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

maximum adult males arent threatened by ability of equality, yet have been threatened by ability of the radical feminist form of "equality". Radicals choose priviliges OVER adult males, no longer the privileges of fellows. Feminism is all approximately revenge. inspite of what people think of of, affirmative action does no longer help to even the sexes, it in basic terms blindly factors priority to non whites, and girls. Ive lost out on tens of one thousand's of greenbacks in scholarships and gives you you, in basic words for being a white guy. No concerns besides the incontrovertible fact that, ill use my magic wand to summon thousands of hundreds of greenbacks.

2017-01-03 21:40:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Don't think the words are "inadequate" or "hostile."

As you put it "radical feminists feeling inadequate." It's just the opposite. It's people like you making assumptions about nothing you have a clue about. Women are sick and tired when men try to make them feel inadequate. Then when women fight back about being labeled inadequate or are told they are inadequate then they are called "radical."

Women have to fight for advancement, equal pay, equal respect, equal rights, just in the work place alone. Women have been fighting for 100's of years for their equal rights. They even had to fight for the right to vote. Have we seen any women presidents yet. Our hero Rosa Parks had to fight for a seat on the bus. She was saying, I'm not inadequate, I can take care of myself, and I'm staying right here in this seat.

Do you think that was a woman, man issue? Do you think she was (as you say) "hostile" to men alone? It's called equal rights for everyone. It took just one woman to get the point across about her equal right to where she chose to sit on that bus.

Because women have to fight for there right to belong, that doesn't mean they are "hostile" toward you. Just don't tell a woman she's inadequate and that you are some how better than she then maybe things could equal out.

2007-10-18 17:34:49 · answer #4 · answered by Eagles Fly 7 · 1 4

They are probably homely like me and no man would touch them with a ten foot pole so they're all angry and bitter about not being hot and drooled over by dudes. When I feel like that I do aerobics rather than become a butch man hater. Although I am considering becoming a lesbian as I can't seem to find a normal good looking man to have kids with. But I'm not gonna be a feminist lesbian. I'm gonna be a pretty feminine girl who just couldn't find a good man to love. There's a difference, cuz I love men. Yet men don't love me, so I gotta go where the love is. And if that's in the arms of a beautiful woman, well then that's where you'll find me.

2007-10-18 16:26:29 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 4 6

I'm sorry you're blocked. (I probably will be soon too.)

But it was a cheap shot against non-feminists and it's a cheap shot against feminists.

Let's not reduce disagreements to armchair psychology, please?

Let's rise above that whole, "You don't like feminism because you have a tiny..." nonsense.

2007-10-18 16:25:20 · answer #6 · answered by Gnu Diddy! 5 · 5 1

Yes, they feel inadequate, and insecure too. Their obsession with cult feminism is the only thing they have left to cling on to. They can never be free until they wake up to the reality, and realize that they have nothing to lose except those chains from around their minds.

2007-10-18 16:49:01 · answer #7 · answered by celtish 3 · 3 3

Hmmmm…

I am a devout feminist, but not a radical one. However, I don’t feel inadequate or hostile towards men.

In fact, I *love* men!

Why not give feminists a break, Chev.

2007-10-19 04:09:25 · answer #8 · answered by Rainbow 6 · 1 3

i am not a radical feminist...at least i dont think i am...

uhm but can i be like an awesome or like totally gnarly feminist? :D

Hi Gnu! ( waves happily) :D

HI MG ( waves happily) :D

ooh poo MG...i dont have a boring life coz im a feminist...i have a boring life coz i have no idea what to do with myself! but maybe thats a good thing...i can be really hyper sometimes! .

2007-10-18 23:06:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

In no time and age did the potential of man unfold itself like in the past century, we went to the moon fer crying out loud, so it might very well be that SOME women fell threatend left out and inferior and react to what they dont understand with fear.

2007-10-19 00:39:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers