Yes.
She's incredibly competent and may actually have a chance to help a few ordinary Americans for a change.
2007-10-18 16:14:34 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She's leading by good margins against Romney, Guliani etc in all polls (including foxnews poll too) and so she will become president in 2008. Republicans have a tendency to be defiant about polls, and thats why they were shocked when GOP lost senate and house. They say they don't believe in polls, but when the lead in polls is of double digits, it is hard to say polls don't count.
2007-10-18 16:20:47 · answer #1 · answered by Math 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I don't think she will even make it onto the ballot in 08. If the Democrats want to win they won't put a woman on the ballot. Sadly to say, our country is still a male-run society and is still not ready for a female leader. Besides, I wouldn't want her in office anyway. Don't you remember the universal healthcare that never was? If she couldn't run that project how can we trust her to run our country? Although, I'm sure she could do a better job than W. He's already run our country into the ground. A team of trained monkeys could do the job better than him. We will need a very strong leader to recover from the damage he's done and I don't think Hilary is it. I haven't seen any candidate so far that would really do that for us.
2007-10-18 16:43:02 · answer #2 · answered by yimmajazzi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mark,
You're are not a moron, and yes Hillary will in 2012.
To the replier who said she is not even if office, I guess both you and I know something that person doesn't. I know that Newt will run against her provided he can let go go of his interest business he is with. It is what has kept him from running now.
Anyone who watched last night's debate in Orlando would have to be a fool to not notice that Hillary is going win.
Did you see that after they bashed Hillary for awhile they went right back to bashing each other. It is a good thing the democratic candidates dont' bash Hillary in the same uncouth style the Republicans are.
2007-10-22 13:06:37 · answer #3 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes she is a lier a crook has little to no experience her health care plan isnt going to help look to canada and england where you wait for months to be treated,she knows how to scam people has no skills at forgein policy she will waste billions and the terriost in the world hope she is elected so they can become strong again and all the special intrest groups are ready to do business with her now if you were talking about c rice for president id say yes she is compent clinton remindes me of a cross between the wicked witch and goofy
2007-10-18 16:22:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
one among my significant concerns approximately President-choose Obama grew to become into his inexperience, and this has been shown by skill of his selection of retread Clintonites or perhaps some Bushers. He would not have his own schedule plenty, in spite of everything. properly...a solid argument might desire to be made that for the time of those afflicted situations we do choose "journey," and that Obama is doing precisely what those human beings who have been worried approximately his inexperience could choose him to do: herald an experienced team. however the biggest situation we mandatory grew to become into "replace." journey is physically powerful, except its only an identical bunch of experienced bozos that have been given us into this mess in the 1st place (the present disarray on the two the foreign places and significant different and youngsters fronts grew to become into truly exacerbated by skill of Bush, even though it had its initiate below Clinton). an magnificent political caricature I observed back in the past Obama even won the nomination confirmed him status on the rostrum on the component to recite the Oath of place of work. back in the gang, sitting on bill's shoulders, is considered Hillary, shouting "I HILLARY RODAM CLINTON DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR..."
2016-10-13 03:35:43 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She has to be elected in 2008 to begin with.
Gotta love how libs tell us that Hillary is inevitable. She's going to win. It preordained. Democracy doesn't matter, we don't need to vote. And if you're not going to vote for her, don't bother voting because it doesn't matter anyway. She's going to win. Yea!!!
Seriously, Kerry was a better candidate. Although I admit Hillary is better than Gore.
You libs need some better candidates...I mean damn people...
2007-10-18 16:22:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
in the event she is elected in 08
there will not be any elections on 2012
she will either declare herself dictator for life or she will start a civil war
2007-10-18 20:13:37 · answer #7 · answered by 1 free American 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes - but you mean as vice president to Mr. Obama.
2007-10-18 16:31:08 · answer #8 · answered by rabble rouser 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, seeing as she's not president yet, she can't be re-elected in 2012. Not to mention that there's a good chance she won't even be elected next year.
2007-10-18 16:20:02 · answer #9 · answered by witchgurl2684 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Thats a scary thought, may God protect the human race if that woman becomes the next president of the United States.
2007-10-18 16:17:00 · answer #10 · answered by Katie E 2 · 6⤊ 4⤋