2007-10-18 15:51:57 · 43 answers · asked by BigSexyBLKMan 1 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Newborn & Baby
personally i do not agree with it but if you are going to get it done wait till he is a year old so he can have anasthetic(not sure about spelling) becasuse before one year they dont get anything
2007-10-18 16:00:14 · answer #1 · answered by M 5 · 6⤊ 6⤋
You have published this BS everywhere Yahoo and I believe I scent an antis circ troll! I was once circumcised at 18 and will guarantee you it's a ways awesome than being uncircumcised. There isn't any lack of sensitivity, that's all BS propaganda from the anti misfits. It definite isn't mutilation, it's perfecting the imperfect. It is far purifier, I have continually showered 2x an afternoon and you'll wash an uncut member 3x an afternoon and also have an scent. It is more healthy, how so much study is wanted? Uncircumcised guys have a 60% larger probability to receive HIV from heterosexual sex. Yes, the USA has a top HIV cost, however the heterosexual Component is most commonly black (50% circ cost) and non white hispanics (lower than 10% circ cost). The white heterosexual male Component may be very very low (87% circumcised). Now the CDC and AAP are each reviewing their role on circumcision and it's tremendously most likely each will pass professional RIC (events baby circumcision). A circumcised penis is far larger watching. Have you obvious what an uncut penis appears like? They aren't very excellent to the attention! It additionally improves sexual role, no person can inform me in any other case. Uncircumcised men pretty much masturbate within their associate, not ever giving or receiving natural pride. There is not anything that's well that comes from being uncircumcised. BTW- i've three boys (five,three,10mo) and had no hesitation to have them snipped! I realize there may be best an upside and a foreskin is solely nasty industry! Amazing quantity of anti Americans on right here!
2016-09-05 14:40:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would you want to? The pain will be much more severe now that he's a little older. I didn't get my youngest cut, after learning more about it I decided that I would never make that mistake again. I have one cut and one uncut, I regret so much getting my oldest cut. Do some more research on it, watch the videos of the procedure, you'll change your mind. When they are this young there's really nothing you need to do. The foreskin wont retract until he's about 3, when it's ready to retract then you start retracting it to clean it, just be sure to pull it back over the head again. E-mail me for more info if you want.
2007-10-18 16:21:56 · answer #3 · answered by Violet 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes it's ok. You will have to take him to a Urologist. The doctor will do it in a hospital. My son got a Tylenol suppository and also anesthesia. We couldn't get him done when he was born because he was in the NICU so we got him done when he was a month old which was the soonest we could. My son was just a little fussy but was ok after an hour. He wasn't crying or anything. I wouldn't wait much longer to do it though.
2007-10-19 05:27:44 · answer #4 · answered by *adria* 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You obviously don't have a medical or religious reason to circumcise him or you would've done it already - so why would you want to do so now? If there is no medical defect with his foreskin, you have no reason to cut off an integral part of his body! And, with respect, its not YOUR genitals you're snipping!
2007-10-20 01:44:15 · answer #5 · answered by Michael 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why would you want to? It is not nessessary nor is it YOUR penis to fiddle with. If he wants it done, after he is 18 and legally able to make his own medical choices, then fine.
Before you do it, do inform yourself of what the procedure really is. The foreskin is FUSED to the head of the penis by a substance like that that holds your fingernail on your finger! They have to PRY IT OFF TO CIRC! It is barbaric.
Would you cut off a baby girls clitoral hood? No. guess what...it is the exact same thing as the foreskin of a penis. We don't mutilate girls, don't do it to a boy!
2007-10-18 18:01:59 · answer #6 · answered by Stephanie C 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No. It's never okay to remove part of someone's genitals without their consent especially without anaesthesia and with no good medical reason.
The longer you leave it the worse it is. How about don't get him done? Assuming you haven't had any problems with his foreskin so far (foreskin problems are rare). Also, it doesn't need to be retracted.
2007-10-21 17:43:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Circumcision has been falling out of favor in the US. There is very little medical benefit. It also desensitizes the penis. Unless you have a religious reason for circumcision, I would advise against it. With infant circumcision the pain is treated with a cotton ball soaked in alcohol. I am unconvinced that is adaquate. In Europe, Austrailia, New Zealand, Canada, South and Central America, circumcision is virtually unknown except for Jews and Muslims. In the US circumcision was developed to prevent masturbation. Something it fails to accomplish.
2007-10-18 16:06:39 · answer #8 · answered by genghis1947 4 · 10⤊ 6⤋
My 3rd son was 6 weeks before we decided to. We all made it through just fine.
2007-10-18 16:11:50 · answer #9 · answered by Kecia Marie 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
If you feel that you must have your son circumcised, then I suppose now is as good a time as any. What you really need to do, though, is ask his pediatrician, and follow his advise. Personally, I think circumcision is an archaic, barbaric practice with no valid, medical basis, and should be avoided.
2007-10-18 15:56:55 · answer #10 · answered by claudiacake 7 · 9⤊ 7⤋
If you don't have it done before you leave the hospital, it is considered cosmetic. A friend of mine has been paying the hospital since his son was a couple of months old. He is NINE>
2007-10-18 16:00:05 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋