English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

Well, duh! Anti-armor ammunition uses depleted uranium and I'm quite sure the government knew/knows about it.

2007-10-18 15:34:07 · answer #1 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 1 0

Do you have a clue what Depleted Uranium is? I do. Everyone is 'exposed' to it in the military. Why? Because the military uses Depleted Uranium Rounds in many large machine guns. We all know it. It poses no danger to our health. Google it and you will see this quote about Depleted Uranium, "there has never been a definitive toxicological link established in humans and it is believed that low and moderate exposures to depleted uranium pose little if any toxicological threat"

So instead of looking for a reason to bash the government you cool aid drinking fool, why dont you worry about the crazy MUSLIMS who would never allow you to utter a free thought.

2007-10-18 22:18:50 · answer #2 · answered by bolt1 3 · 1 1

NEWS BRIEF: "Silent WMD's -- Effects of Depleted Uranium", by Admiral Vishnu Bhagwatt, February 29, 2004, traprockpeace.org

DU weapons emit 'Alpha' particle dose to a single cell from U-238, which is 50 times the annual dose level. Cancer is initiated with one alpha particle, its daughter isotopes effect generations as the isotopes bio-concentrate in plants and animals and travel up the food chain. It is a nuclear weapon ... They enter the body through the lungs, the digestive system, or breaks in the skin. One gram of DU releases more than 12,000 particles per second. The radiation slowly kills the cells that make life possible. The Gulf War Syndrome of 1991 did just that (reported by Dr. Asaf Durakovic, Professor of Medicine, Georgetown University)."

This paragraph is simply pregnant with understanding, so let us stop for a moment to digest just what we have learned:

1. Cancer is initiated in a person when that person ingests just "one alpha particle"! This is consistent with what our original sources told us. When either a soldier or a civilian breathes in just one dust speck contaminated with DU, that person will ultimately get cancer. The process may take 3-12 years, but that person will eventually die. Dust blows throughout arid Iraq, thus making it likely that most of our soldiers and Iraqi civilians, will ultimately breathe in a speck of dust contaminated from an exploded DU munitions. Later in his report, Admiral Bhagwatt reported that this contaminated dust has spread in a 1,000-mile radius from Baghdad!

2. D.U. is scientifically considered to be a "nuclear weapon". Thus, each of our last three Presidents have waged a silent nuclear war against countries with majority Muslim populations: Iraq in 1991; Kosovo in 1999; Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003.

3. Since D.U. poisons the air, the dust, the water and the food chain, my original sources were right again when they warned that we were rendering Iraq unsuitable for human habitation. This process is likely to take a generation, but it will occur.

4. The 1991 "Gulf War Syndrome" was largely D.U. poisoning. As our medical officer in a foreign army warned, the D.U. interacts dangerously and unpredictably with the toxic vaccinations to produce a variety of maladies amongst its victims.

Whenever I have written that we are quite possibly poisoning the entire land, people have objected, saying that we did not ruin the land of Japan by detonating atomic bombs over Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Not being either a scientist or a trained military officer, I could not offer a reasonable explanation for this indisputable fact. The good Indian Admiral has done just that, quantifying the disaster in terms laymen can understand.

Let us now go back to the article by Admiral Bhagwatt:

"The induction of DU weapons in 1991 in Iraq ... broke a 46-year taboo. This Trojan Horse of nuclear war ... continues to be used more and more. DU remains radioactive longer than the age of the earth (estimated at 4.5 billion years). The long-term effects from over a decade of DU exposures ... are devastating. The increased quantities of radioactive material ... used in Afghanistan are 3 to 5 times greater than Iraq, 1991. In Iraq, 2003, they are already estimated to be 6 to 10 times 1991, and will travel through a larger area and affect many more people, babies and unborn. Countries within a 1000-mile radius of Baghdad and Kabul are being affected by radiation poisoning ..." [Ibid.]

2007-10-18 23:16:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It's going on now, too.

2007-10-18 22:13:53 · answer #4 · answered by Ben Has Questions 2 · 2 0

never heard this before...maybe its to make Spartan-like soldiers? ...

2007-10-18 22:16:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i believe most commercial planes have it in them.....................

2007-10-18 22:23:34 · answer #6 · answered by richard t 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers