You are mistaken grasshopper. Liberal democrats have always used that attack on successful republicans. Bush the elder was out of touch even though it was Clinton saying it was the worst economy in 50 years (except for the 30s, 60s, and the 70s)
Reagan was a bumbler even though he outfoxed the Soviets and the democrats at every turn.
This Bush is dumb even though he had more education than any of his opponents and out maneuvered the democrats repeatedly.
They said that Ford was an oaf except before he was president and after he died. Then he was a wonderful person that they all admired.
Nixon was a crook who was never convicted of anything. He did have personnel and personality problems. Of course Ted Kennedy was a convicted felon and there were all those democrats caught up in Abscam plus Wilber Mills.
Like I said its an old democratic ploy.
X2000 has it wrong. He didn't count that only 60% of people voted in the 2000 election. So over half the people didn't vote for Bush. Wasn't the first time the winner of the electoral college didn't have the majority. Lincoln was another, Truman did it, so did Wilson. In 2004 Bush got more votes than any other candidate in US history.
2007-10-18 14:05:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
He "managed" to graduate from Yale because of his father's skill and money. that is the reason he were given into the school contained in the first position. Noelle Bush, daughter of Florida governor Jeb Bush (and George's niece), "managed" to graduate from Florida State Univesity regardless of not often attending classes, and receiving grades that would have failed maximum different pupils. She become in drug rehab for 3/4 of her senior 365 days and nonetheless managed a "B" well-known. all and multiple is conscious you by no skill fail the governor's infant, i comprehend for a truth a minimum of two professor's (non-tenured)were threatened with termination at the same time as they tried to fail her. look it up contained in the Tallahassee Democrat. Aslo, no offense to the organization grad's accessible, yet an MBA from ANY college is easily no longer all that confusing to get. i'm no longer asserting that is immediately ahead, even though it truly would not require an excellent style of intelligence. Bush has lost a lot money in very sick-conceived organization ventures, i ask your self how everybody might want to cite his degree as info of intelligence? I call Bush no longer in basic terms incompetent, yet stupid besides. he's stupid because he easily beleive's his personal bullshlt. He extremely idea the Iraqi's might want to welcome the US with open fingers. He extremely does imagine he's doing "God's artwork", and it by no skill occours to him that perchance he's faulty. once you beleive your own BS, you're stupid.
2016-10-21 09:41:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Democrats mostly complain about anything Bush does. Republicans certainly cant be entirely happy with the way the country is going.
Independants would like to see more middle ground.
However you feel, we must all admit that when the democrats get into the presidency, if any thing goes wrong its because of something Bush must of done.
2007-10-18 14:03:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by friendly advice from maine 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
America is a Republic, not a Democracy. Read your history books. We elect our representatives democratically, we do not legislate democratically.
We are in trouble when illiterates like Wally above are allowed to cast their vote.
2007-10-18 14:19:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are correct that it is a democratic country. George Bush is one of the best republican presidents that we have had. He has been fighting a hidden war, improved national protection and established many new things for the poor. He has lowered taxes a lot for my self. If a democratic president would be electred next, the stock market would go way down, and inflation would go way up. Democrats raise taxes and want to help all people...lol
"Dont fall into the trap... Democrats are full of crap"
2007-10-18 14:07:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
What I think is funny is most of the people who call him stupid don't have an IQ anywhere near as high as his IQ of 146. I get a real laugh when I see some idiot liberal call him stupid.
2007-10-18 14:20:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, the question mark definitely belongs after "Democratic country" because a nine year old can hack a Diebold vote machine, and there is significant evidence for foul play.
2007-10-18 14:09:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ben Has Questions 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Its a cheap way to feel good for those with low ethics and little patriotism.
However, calling his decisions stupid would be reasonable (not necessarily right, but reasonable).
The playground behavior of political bigotry is getting rather tiring, isn't it.
Patriots on BOTH sides should speak up against these actions, especially in their own party (assuming they haven't completely sold out their ethics to continue to "appear to be the right ones".
2007-10-18 14:01:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
I AGREE! Buuut, he was lucky he slipped by the skin of his teeth.
Anyways, everyone stop complaining and do something beneficial. Complaining won't get him out of office, nothing humane will, but try doing stuff for your community and etc?
2007-10-18 14:00:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well, I think most of the people who think he's an idiot didn't vote for him. And he didn't even win the popular vote the first time. And, I really do love America, but people who still support him are out of their mind. I mean, just look at what he's been doing! It's like that bumper sticker, "if you're not outraged, you're not paying attention".
2007-10-18 14:00:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by ₪ڠYiffniff ڠ₪ 5
·
1⤊
3⤋