English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know way too many people that use social security or unemployment just to buy drugs... and I think it hurts the system when these people don't contribute back to society. Should they be drug tested? or what

2007-10-18 12:33:35 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

wow, i guess what i was trying to say came off wrong... but alot of you are dumb as s hit... drug laws are another story

2007-10-20 13:27:01 · update #1

16 answers

Social Security? no. Unemployment? most people have to get a drug test to get a job, and they have to be looking for work in order to collect unemployment.

2007-10-22 10:08:18 · answer #1 · answered by Penny K 6 · 0 0

Well lets just drug test for everything.
Passports, Drivers licences, Social Security, 401K Retirement, and access to Yahoo Answers.
I think you might mind your own business. How do you happen to hang out with people who use SS Retirement and Unemployment to buy drugs?
Are you dealing ?

2007-10-18 12:39:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Social security , no need for it. unemployment, not a bad idea.
You know someone on drugs will fail the drug test, thereby making himself unsuitable for employment. Of course, there would be a zillion to one chance against it passing . too many peole think taking drugs is ok.

2007-10-18 12:57:32 · answer #3 · answered by TedEx 7 · 1 0

you clearly dont know anything about unemployment laws to be saying this. you have to have had a job to get unemployment and you had to have been on good terms meaning you were not fired for misconduct of any kind. unemployment only lasts for up to 26 weeks which is 6 months and you get one third of what you were making before. my husband happened to be on unemployemnt after a major lay off and his salary was 80k he was barelly getting half on unemployment. so i really dont know that wich what you get you can buy drugs. and no ... no one should be drug tested. coz tomorrow it could be you. would you want that to happen to you?

2007-10-18 17:11:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anna 4 · 1 0

Surely you jest! If not, you need a strong dose of reality.

The Elderly have already contributed to Society. They gave birth to you, didn't they?

As far as the Unemployed, that paltry amount barely covers the rent, the heat, the lights and a bottle of aspirin.

2007-10-22 12:35:27 · answer #5 · answered by Me, Too 6 · 0 0

Isnt that contributing to the economy. Or should only employed people buy drugs.
The government has enabled people with addictions to become dependent on the handout. In San Francisco they are considering to have a safe place for drug users to shoot up. Cant have them being injecting themselves in a unsafe enviorment.

DAMN WORLD HAS GONE MAD.

2007-10-18 13:56:41 · answer #6 · answered by friendly advice from maine 5 · 0 2

What are you, some kind of a nut? People pay for these services while working. If they lose their jobs or retire & are of age, they have a right to these benefits. They are no more on drugs percentage wise, than regular working people.

2007-10-18 12:39:13 · answer #7 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 4 0

Should you be tested for drugs, for you have a higher probability of using then someone who has already lived his/her life and is now enjoying their own money.

Better yet, do you think you should be checked for brain damage? Jealousy will get you no where!

2007-10-18 12:40:48 · answer #8 · answered by Richard S 4 · 1 0

No, But Politicians Should.

Cocaine And Hookers Are Fun!

~Rep. Robert Wexler, D-Fla

2007-10-18 12:41:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

a million. No schedule, do exactly no longer think of my tax money ought to bypass to those that placed funds into unlawful drugs. i might extremely see it bypass to those that easily want the money for food. 2. IMO, as quickly as whilst they first prepare. If there's a historic previous of drug use (criminal checklist or previous mess ups), then each month. in any different case as quickly as each 6 months. In my state you already ought to fill out workplace work to study your difficulty (earnings, residing difficulty and so forth) each 6 months, so a piss try might in simple terms join that technique. testing could be paid for by using the state. i do no longer see any distinction between finding out to purchase a drug try or paying finished time workers who do no longer something yet reveal screen welfare applicants to verify in basic terms qualified human beings get reward. Its area of the fee of administering this technique. 3. fake positives are very uncommon yet every person who assessments useful might have a huge gamble to re-try. The state might pay for the re-try if the consequence comes decrease back detrimental. Any prescription drugs that reasons a failed try could be actually traced to the approved healthcare expert who prescribed the medicine so as that. inner maximum companies cope with this issue each and all of the time, why could no longer the government do it too? 4. No, it would not violate the 4th modification because of the fact the guideline would not rigidity every person to take a drug try. It in basic terms says that in case you elect for welfare reward you ought to take the try. every person can decide out of the try by using in simple terms no longer employing for reward, in simple terms such as you are able to decide out of a pre-employment drug try by using no longer employing for jobs at companies that require it.

2016-12-15 03:25:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers