It is awesome. I drive one and it is better than the crappy F350 I traded in.
2007-10-18 11:55:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Honda has never been into trucks so they borrowed GM's body and Frame it can Haul but it does not have the engine to do it. Honda is great at making road race cars, but road race cars have no need for high torque and trucks do. GM is the best no competition, Ford, Dodge are very good trucks as well but GM invented the truck. So much so that Toyota's share a lot of parts with GM, Is ridiculous what I herd a few days ago about unreliable Tundras. My own opinion that is crap, I don't know the reasoning behind what those idiots said about TOYOTA Tundras, but to have them know it they share the exact same transmission with the 2007 best truck of the year that they also honored and yes is a GM. I won't believe anything anyone says about any vehicle unless is an actual independent entity that uses average people to test vehicles, none of these bias hypocrites that probably did not even know that the Tundras share the same transmission as a top of the line GM truck and that says a lot because no one should ever talk bad about GM no one, directly or indirectly.
2007-10-18 19:01:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by wiseornotyoudecide 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Far from it. First of all, it features a uni-body frame, which makes it too weak to be a real truck. Second of all, the drive train is not made for doing work. It has a sideways engine and a transaxle!! Not truck material. If you want a truck that is not capable of working, then fine, get the Ridgeline. But if you are getting a truck to do some real work, look elseware.
Also, they are the ugliest vehicles ever created, but I guess we should applaud Honda for giving blind designers a career opportunity.
2007-10-18 19:16:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by atvman_400 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
I would say its one of the best. Honda came up with simple useful ideas in that truck that no other company thought of doing before. Honda Ridgeline won best Pick up of the year because of its innovative ideas and practicality and reliability.
2007-10-18 22:42:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by C7S 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Not even close. Sorry, but it's just slightly more useful than a Subaru Baja. The bed is so short that anything you could fit in it would probably fit in a typical sedan or station wagon, the AWD system coupled with a lack of a manual transmission makes it useless for towing, and its engine was designed for a car so it doesn't produce the torque needed for a truck.
2007-10-18 18:51:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Personally, I don't think so. They are nice, but what about the towing capacity and the hauling capacity? Ford trucks have them in those catagories.
I have had Ford trucks for years, decades is more like it. While I have had a couple of problems with them over the years, I have never had any thing serious go wrong with them, and I never had one leave me stranded on the road.
good luck.
2007-10-18 18:51:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Fordman 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Pound for Pound and Feature for feature, This P/U stands above the competition. It might lack a V-8, but can handle almost all of the normal jobs requested of a P/U. Don't overlook the trunk within a bed.
2007-10-18 18:52:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Richard F 2
·
1⤊
4⤋
its a sport utility not a truck...if it were a truck you could go buy a piece of plywood and bring it home not happening with this soccer mom ride
2007-10-18 18:54:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by dazed12839 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
Trunk in the bed. How Idiotic you quote this as something great.
2007-10-18 19:19:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bryan W 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
No way, not even close. BARELY able to even CALL it a truck.
2007-10-18 18:51:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Baron_von_Party 6
·
1⤊
2⤋