theyre breeding like rabbits
2007-10-18 11:24:32 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There is quite a difference.
If we stopped paying poor people to have children,they would stop having them for money purposes. I would never deprive a person from having a child because they were poor as long as they can raise the child themselves.
2007-10-18 11:36:13 · answer #1 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree but lets be fair, lets neuter the rich first!
They don't work, they don't struggle to survive, they waste natural recourses, so in other words there pussi-es.
The poor are the dummy's that joined the military to protect them, the poor pick the crops so they can eat.
You don't need rich people to survive, because they don't know how to survive, poor people do.
Think before you speak
2007-10-18 19:03:55 · answer #2 · answered by man of ape 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And the gov't should be able to control people's reproductive lives like that? That's awful... that's the way Nazi Germany got started. A much better way to fix overpopulation is to MAKE PEOPLE RICHER because when people are living comfortably, they have fewer kids. Or, the gov't could stop with this abstinence-only tripe...
2007-10-18 18:59:54 · answer #3 · answered by Lynn M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And who gets to decide who gets spayed? You? Heil!
Seriously, you just can't do this, as unfit as many people are to be parents (and being poor often has little to do with that). I'd be more in favor of requiring some sort of license, or at least some training--for parenthood. Again, I don't mean "poor" people; I mean anyone. You have to take a test to drive a car, for god's sake.
2007-10-18 18:35:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The courage of the Founding Fathers, the courage of a Patrick Henry who said "give me liberty or give me death," the courage of the Great Generation who defeated Hitler, is gone.
Our courage was our mightiest asset. Your question verifies you as a soft, undereducated Nazi coward, eagerly awaiting the next Fuhrer.
America is already on the road to castration.. You are living proof.
Happy?
2007-10-18 19:40:13 · answer #5 · answered by KALEL 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because they are human beings (unlike some posters to this site).
No human being supports forced sterilization.
2007-10-18 22:27:25 · answer #6 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because we live in a free country and not one where the government has all control in our lives.....at least for now. Eugenics is a fascinating, if warped subject....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics
2007-10-18 18:37:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Is THIS what is considered "Pro Life" by the Right Wingers?
Amazing. Tell me something, speaking as an outsider, what's your opinion of the human race?
2007-10-18 18:33:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
It is apparent to me that you inherited more dollars than sense from your parents.
Either that our you are a liberal trouble maker pretending to be a conservative saying thiings that will discredit conservatives.
2007-10-18 18:42:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we should neuter people that can't tell the difference between animals and people first. Get in line.
2007-10-18 18:30:03 · answer #10 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 11⤊ 1⤋