DNA
2007-10-18 10:53:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by B"Quotes 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would take a DNA test for the simple fact that if it is yours, you have a lot of catching up to do. I would also do the test, because if you don't, she could try and get you with back-child support, but most importantly, why did she never tell you before and why is she finally telling you now? What was the motive of her sudden change of heart? Sounds kind of fishy to me, and I would just protect yourself and the child, and get a DNA so that you can start to put the pieces together.
2007-10-18 10:58:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by DM 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do a DNA test just because it was so long ago and this is the first you have heard about it. Sleeping with her only once is no a defining factor because that is all it takes. I would just be leary because all the sudden, 10 years later, she decides to tell you. What took her so long?
2007-10-18 10:56:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by littleone 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey, it only takes ONE time, & I would definitely have the DNA done; haven't you ever watched those t.v. shows to where the woman is positive some dude is the father of her child, just to find out that He is NOT. If it was me, I would want to know, for my ownself, as well.
2007-10-18 10:58:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by srbyn1 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I should do a DNA, because, the child can be mine or not, and then if the child were mine, I´d like to know her or him.
2007-10-18 13:19:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by edmia_147 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It only takes once. Yes i would get a DNA.
2007-10-18 10:53:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by patches 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Depends on the totality of the circumstances. If it is necessary to know for some reason, sure.
2007-10-18 10:58:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd probably want a DAN test if there other guys in her life around the same time.
2007-10-18 10:55:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Joe F 7
·
0⤊
1⤋