English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My son and I were watching ‘Weird Science’ last weekend, and having a good laugh. The more we watched, the less far-fetched of an idea this seemed to us. Why COULDN’T we make a girl from scratch? Each of us placed in a science fair while in school, so the idea didn’t seem so out of our reach.

We put together the things we thought we would need, and we even strapped two of his mother’s bras on our heads, paying homage to the movie. The deeper we delved in, the more things began to go wrong. I’m not sure exactly what happened, as much of it is a blur, but SOMETHING happened. Smoke began to erupt from both our kitchen and our family PC. We live in California, where earth tremors are a part of life. At the very moment this was happening, the earth began to shake. My son became terrified, and ran downstairs... {more}

2007-10-18 08:33:10 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

He grabbed some Jell-O from our refrigerator, and began to smear it all over our linoleum floors. He later explained to me that this was to prevent anything from coming in to attack us.

Shortly thereafter, our next door neighbor came over to see if we were OK, following the tremor, and in the chaos of the moment, he slipped on the Jell-O and dislocated his shoulder.

Are we legally liable for my neighbor’s medical bills, as he seems to think we are?

2007-10-18 08:33:29 · update #1

I actually had fusilli figurine on the floor and he kinda sat on it

2007-10-18 08:51:37 · update #2

10 answers

You guys sound like loons. It will be a wonder if your house isn't blessed by a gaggle of priests.

No freak could even dream this kind of thing up.

2007-10-18 08:39:37 · answer #1 · answered by bamidélé 4 · 5 1

Your difficulty is that a member of the popular public ought extremely have the potential to physique of techniques your sources and "ring your bell" without danger of non-public harm. needless to say you do not have hounds to launch, or you will not have mandatory pepper spray. Pity you ought to no longer supply up them on the boudary fence. Your counter declare for loss of amenity and solace for his or her tortious strikes is a probable set off off. yet i think of you could stand of challenge of protecting their declare in case you could teach that each and one and all those pesky little brats have been in it jointly... for that reason warning one... is a warning to all of them. Did you point out which you published an illustration... "warning: bell ringers and candy grabbers would be pepper sprayed and danger serious pores and skin and eye irritations"? (greater useful flow and make one now.. i think of you would be wanting it ~ that's civil regulation.... all and sundry does it you comprehend, jees.) you may could teach that this became right into a united front of harassment.. for example, have been all of them a members of an identical gang... the form you teach that's actually a count of study and presentation of evidence. you're saying that they have been all dressed absurdly.... this evidence incredibly works on your favour for example. you will desire a grumpy ol' bastard for a barrister, too. good success with that.

2016-12-18 11:06:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

holy...
yes u are liable for injuries to vistors or others on your property at all times!

Anti up and do the right thing...pay the bills...ask him to bring the bills to you and you pay them.

This is why you have homeowners insurance.

Besides...if you pay the bills (as you should)...maybe he wont sue u in small claims for pain and suffering. I would have your homeowners insurance cover it.

good luck :)

2007-10-18 08:43:19 · answer #3 · answered by Blue October 6 · 2 1

I'd go ahead and pay them, then counter sue for B&E. If he was in your home without your permission, you can probably get a plasma TV out of the whole ordeal.

2007-10-18 08:39:26 · answer #4 · answered by Armless Joe, Bipedal Foe 6 · 5 1

Only if the neighbor slipped and his *** landed on a Mason jar!

2007-10-18 08:48:57 · answer #5 · answered by Barry C 7 · 2 1

hi, your are liable as oithers have said however you can counter- sue for the loss of life of your fusili figure

2007-10-18 09:03:49 · answer #6 · answered by vanilli 3 · 2 0

Yes.

2007-10-18 08:39:52 · answer #7 · answered by raichasays 7 · 2 1

I don't even know if I believe this one. But yes, that's what homeowners insurance is for.

2007-10-18 08:41:41 · answer #8 · answered by Debbie Queen of All ♥ 7 · 2 1

lol, i have to say that was one of the most amusing questions i have read. i have no answer, but kudos for making me laugh!

2007-10-18 08:41:25 · answer #9 · answered by Jessica 3 · 4 0

what psycho dreamt this question up?

a psycho genious...

if this is serious, then yes, you are liable....your house your insurance...

2007-10-18 08:48:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers