Sandy Berger is a convicted criminal,the fact that he was allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge is a disgrace,and irrelevant. The guy has shown himself to be a thoroughly corrupt individual,who found it more important to protect the Clinton administration from answering for their mistakes,than to help protect America.
2007-10-18 06:47:24 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nothing Hilary will do will make these idiots wake up. They are in love with the idea of the government taking care of them.
2007-10-18 06:52:50 · answer #1 · answered by Bob J 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
You mean THIS Sandy Berger? Personally, I think he did the country a service. I dont think BushCheney, Inc. liked it one bit. And of course FOX/GOP-TV didnt like it either. Former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger was sentenced Thursday to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them.
Berger must perform 100 hours of community service and pay the fine as well as $6,905 for the administrative costs of his two-year probation, a district court judge ruled.
"I deeply regret the actions that I took at the National Archives two years ago, and I accept the judgment of the court," Berger said outside the courthouse after his sentencing.
"I'm glad that the 9/11 commission has made clear that it received all the documents that it sought, all the documents that it needed, and I'm pleased to finally have this matter resolved," he added.
Berger reached a plea deal with federal prosecutors in April to avoid a jail sentence.
At that time, he said the reason he took the documents was so he could prepare himself and others to assist the 9/11 commission, which investigated the circumstances surrounding the 2001 terrorist attacks and published a report of its findings last year.
The documents taken by Berger dealt with the terror threats during the 2000 millennium celebration, according to parties in the case.
According to the charges, Berger -- between September 2 and October 2, 2003 -- "knowingly removed classified documents from the National Archives and Records Administration and stored and retained such documents at places," such as his private Washington office.
Berger's associates admit he took five copies of an after-action report detailing the 2000 millennium terror plot from the Archives. The aides say Berger returned to his office, discovered that three of the copies appeared to be duplicates and cut them up with scissors.
The revelations were a dramatic change from Berger's claim last year that he had made an "honest mistake" and either misplaced or unintentionally threw the documents away.
When Archives officials contacted him after they realized documents were missing, Berger told them about the two copies he had, and returned them, along with his handwritten notes, officials said.
2007-10-18 06:54:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
perhaps in a international of excellent judgment and common sense. If she is voted in assume to verify a good purchase extra of this. For a miles better photograph of what variety of issue this is. think of if this became right into a republican doing this and the democrats, fairly Hillary, have been given a carry of this recommendations and how they might call for resignations, impeachments, regulation and order and each thing else decrease than the sunlight. yet for the reason it fairly is democrats it must be ok. in spite of everything, this looks to be their social gathering coverage. I advise, they get on for 4 firings of D.A. by using Gonzalez whilst Clinton fired ninety 3. They get on conventional Petraeus, Rush Limbaugh of each physique, and continuously downing Bush. yet check out what they do. unlawful dealings, coping with criminals, and so plenty extra. yet do no longer talk good judgment on the subject of democrats, for the reason it fairly is 'suitable-wing' propaganda and conspiracies.
2016-12-15 03:07:40 · answer #3 · answered by kieck 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is the matter Neocon? Why do you keep smearing and demonising decent and Honourable people with your poisonous lies and propaganda? How about your leaders criminal Bush and Cheney whose help are they enlisting in order to perpetrate another crime against humanity?
2007-10-18 07:01:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There are a lot of things that expose Hitlary's corrupt nature. This is CERTIANLY telling.
2007-10-18 12:12:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's not working on the campaign. She's just giving him a no-show job so he won't write a book about his years in the Clinton White House.
2007-10-18 06:54:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
No she does not. Whose help does blood thirsty Bush is enlisting now in order to trick American People and the rest of the World to start another war with Iran.
2007-10-18 06:53:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Yes, a bag-man is always convenient to have around. Bet she gets him another TS security clearance.
2007-10-18 06:51:41 · answer #8 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
No, he's not Henry Kissinger. He can at least leave the country without fear of arrest unlike Bush crony Kissinger.
2007-10-18 06:50:41 · answer #9 · answered by Holy Cow! 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
What do you mean by expose, she is corruption incarnate
2007-10-18 06:51:15 · answer #10 · answered by a person of interest 5 · 6⤊ 3⤋