Used false evidence to get us into a war?
I mean the least he could have done was plant some physical evidence in Iraq. Lets face it, he is not an actor like ronald reagan was so we are less apt to believe his lies like we did reagan's.
2007-10-18 04:53:29 · 21 answers · asked by courage 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
GW has done an excellent job for his best friends in Big Oil and the Military Industrial Complex. the price of oil has skyrocketed providing Big Oil with continuing record profits and the stockholders in the Military Industrial Complex couldn't be happier with GW's never ending "war on terror".
"MISSION ACCOMPLISHED"
2007-10-18 05:02:57 · answer #1 · answered by nebtet 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
OK now when the World Intelligence community all has the same story. How exactly is that a lie? The UN was investigating Iraq for years and was unable to conclude if there were weapons of mass destruction or not. You want to blame Bush but the blame need to be put on IRAQ where is belongs. Or you can even put the blame on the UN for being so ineffective in resolving this issue. It was known he had these weapon and that he had used them. There is no doubt what so ever. The idea that this was all just a lie to get us to go to War is just part of a Liberal Plot to win seats in Congress and perhaps the Whitehouse. That is why Bush has not and can not be Impeached for this stupid theory. I am not even a Republican and I don’t even support Bush, but it is plain and clear that ignorance run through the media. The idea that this was all just a lie and a plot is as Stupid as anything the Liberals in this country has ever thought up. I think you may want to read thing and look at the facts in the case before spewing the Garbage you see on TV.
Knowledge is power that the Liberals would soon you not weld. Ignorant people are allot easier to control. If we are to grow as a socialist nation we need to keep our people as far away from the truth as possible.
2007-10-18 12:17:47 · answer #2 · answered by Twigits 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Many of our politicians, Republican and Democrat, were deceived by the bad intelligence they received on Iraq. That being said, Bush was the "decider."
I think a good comparison is a corporation. If the CEO makes a bad decision that impact the performance of the company, no matter the reason, he or she will be held accountable.
Bush should be held accountable.
2007-10-18 12:05:54 · answer #3 · answered by wooper 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Intelligence showed that Saddam had weapons of Mass Destruction. We know it was true. He used them on his own people. Just because we didn't find them doesn't mean they weren't there. Get over it. George Bush may not seem like he is the smartest human in the world but he is a man who follows his convictions and does not change directions according to the polls. Someone said Hillary in 08... She has changed so positions on the war so many times you need a score card to keep up.
And everyone who thinks he is so stupid, how can he be that stupid and be smart enough to pull something like this off. Even Hillary Clinton stated that Saddam had to be removed from office. She bragged about voting for the war.
2007-10-18 12:05:27 · answer #4 · answered by Dean C 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
America seems to swallow Bush's lies without much problem. Have you heard the new one he is trying to push? World War III! Now there is something to think about.
By the way Bush got every general to lie about the situation in Iraq. He ruined Powell. And he got General Petraus to BetrayUS.
2007-10-18 12:04:28 · answer #5 · answered by repstat 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
These people forget the WH had plenty of warnings, the F BI had info on these guys and AbleDanger-all leads were told to step down, they absolutely knew the letter was bogus and at least NINE countries warned of impending attack and oALL OUR DEFENSE OUT OF IT THAT DAY-come on let's not be ridiculous.
2007-10-18 12:07:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me!
Once bitten, twice shy! Look at the events that led up to Pearl Harbor and Vietnam, it's starting to look the same all the time. Bin Laden used to work with our government in the Afganistan war against Russia, ever think he maybe still works for us??? We haven't killed him and they aren't really trying to find him either, GW has even said so.
2007-10-18 12:06:27 · answer #7 · answered by Ktcyan 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i guess bush took all the intelligence from every source he could and discarded it. even though everyone on the intelligence committe, rep and dem, agreed on the info. and i guess colin powell bold faced lied, with backing from the dems and reps, to the u.n. i do not pretend to know all the details but everyone at those hearings did and voted to authorize the war, rep and dem. let's impeach them all.
2007-10-18 12:07:51 · answer #8 · answered by BRYAN H 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I guess that makes just about everybody a liar then. Do you know what all went into this process? Evidently not! Your freind Hillary and Pelosi also agreed with it based on the evidence Bill Clinton had said earlier about WMD when in office! And there is more to this, I'd suggest you thoroughly check it all out!
2007-10-18 11:59:24 · answer #9 · answered by Brianne 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
bush is a liar! a president should be smart, clever and most of all making the right decisions.
but bush is the complete opposite of all those things listed and more
2007-10-18 12:00:47 · answer #10 · answered by sulz152 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋