English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

WW III ????

Seems now it's on everyones mind.... it's like a psycological snowball affect. He couldn't think of another term ?...he just had to say it didn't he !?

It's more irresponsible than yelling fire in a crowded movie theater in my opinion....because those words went out to the world !

Now how do we stop this hysteria now that has everyone convinced that WW III is unavoidable or has already started ?

This is MADNESS !...MADNESS I TELL YOU !!!...lol

2007-10-18 04:30:45 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

I think "Bring- it-on" was a bad selection of words to use as well. I think he is being bad & doing what his advisors tell him not to do...he is thinking up his own material! Bad presy!

2007-10-18 04:38:17 · answer #1 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 2 0

Is anybody surprised this guy says things without thinking?

"I'm honored to shake the hand of a brave Iraqi citizen who had his hand cut off by Saddam Hussein."—Washington, D.C., May 25, 2004

"And there is distrust in Washington. I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town. And I'm sorry it's the case, and I'll work hard to try to elevate it."— Speaking on National Public Radio, Jan. 29, 2007.

There are just so many I can't put them all...


Nevermind what he says. Mind what he DOES.

2007-10-18 05:00:00 · answer #2 · answered by dRew 2 · 1 0

Get it right now... Hillary voted in want of the Kyl-Lieberman replace .Which lists the Islamic present day shield of Iran as a "distant places places present day company 17 november." Now, the Islamic present day shield is the main significant branch of the Iranian protection tension. for the time of using putting the Iranian shield on the U.S. terrorist checklist, the Senate ( controlled for the time of using the Democrats) has categorized the army of Iran as a protection tension of terrorists. The President, has all the help he demands for putting forward in his next speech to a protection tension or veterans team that Iran is a u . s . of terrorists. So the Dem's have shown there help,no longer on the merchandising campaign course, however the region it counts,With their Votes...... submit to in recommendations, you're Democrats additionally supported the Iraq conflict.. authentic, as nicely Obama (as he likes to remind us... Oh wait, he wasn't a senator .... sooooo.. he would desire to no longer vote.. he forgets to instruct that .. )

2016-12-29 16:37:09 · answer #3 · answered by geise 4 · 0 0

Irresponsible pretty much names his whole term in office. I think he gets very excited by the aspect of a third world war. He just needs to go away.

2007-10-18 04:39:09 · answer #4 · answered by gone 7 · 2 0

What more can you expect from a President as sloppy as he is. Any person in any other job would have been ordered to collect their personal effects and wait while security stood by to escort them from the building. A 24% Job rating just about sums it up.

2007-10-18 04:39:37 · answer #5 · answered by batfood1 4 · 2 0

Too bad it isn't really funny!
He uttered those words because he knows that waving OBL and the war on terror in Americans face no longer scares them the way it used to!
If anything he is trying to start it!!!

2007-10-18 04:45:45 · answer #6 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 1 0

Right, I guess we should just pretend like we're not concerned and do a sneak attack if needed. Current events are frightening - why not let them know we're taking it seriously. Shhhhhh..... Let's just pretend like it's not happening, typical roll-over liberal mentality.

2007-10-19 09:01:17 · answer #7 · answered by pgb 4 · 0 0

I don't think it was irresponsible; just daft. There are some words and topics that should be reserved for back channels, not for public expression.

2007-10-18 04:35:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

GW is a psychopath. the evil moronic MF was actually giggling as he alluded to WW3.

2007-10-18 04:40:06 · answer #9 · answered by nebtet 6 · 3 0

He was hypocritical to insinuate Iran would in some way be responsible for WWIII when in reality he is the world leader that is driving us towards that brink.

2007-10-18 04:35:13 · answer #10 · answered by Elmer R 4 · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers