what's your opinion on TV licencing?

Question

I think we should be given the option to choose if we really wanna watch the BBC channels, those who do, should pay the cost n those who don't should't. Better still why not get rid of the licence n have BBC do adverts just like any other channel then we wouldn't have to pay. I'm really tired of paying this fee as I hardly watch any BBC channel.

Answer 1

You make a very valid point,i wrote letters to my MP and various other bodies,many years ago,on this very subject.I was informed you have to pay for it whether you watch it or not,which is morally wrong and legalised robbery.BBC are now in trouble through bad management,old boys clubs and other problems better not gone into.To make it earn its keep is one answer,but goverment control over certain aspects of televised broadcasting will most certainly come into any future equations.The most interesting fact to watch will be,how much the various properties fetch,where the money goes,who buys the property and what will be the future designated use of the property and who will benefit.Watch that space.

Answer 2

If you could invent and market a device that eliminated adverts, people would pay three times the licence fee to buy one.

A lot of advert based TV is absolute tripe, mind-numbing 'chewing gum for the eyes', the sole purpose of which is to use whatever voyeristic tactic to keep you glued to the box so they can push adverts in your face.

It costs a lot more to make programmes which are not funded by adverts, and because the objective is not to keep you from "touching that dial", the quality is better. People and their friends might hate learning and prefer to veg in front of crap, but it doesn't mean everyone thinks that way. The silent majority just pay the fee without question or whining about it.

Before you reach for that rate down button. Did you realise that the BBC Licence fee also funds the BBC news channels, the news website, the radio stations Radio 1, Radio 2, Radio 3, Radio 4, Radio 5 Live, Radio 6, Radio 7, The world service, the shipping forecast etc etc etc?

Why didn't you know this? Now I don't like Chris Moyles, but 18,000,000 people tune in every morning. So that's 18M people who either don't object to the licence, or are too stupid or hypocritical to realise that the licence fee is not just TV.

The BBC has done more to raise people's intellect than any other station on the planet. Give it a try :)

Answer 3

In the UK, a television licence is required for every loved ones where tv programmes are watched as they are broadcast, regardless of the sign process (terrestrial, satellite tv for pc, cable or the internet). A licence just isn't required, nonetheless, in the event you use your television handiest to observe DVDs or play video games, otherwise you only watch programmes to your pc after they have got been proven on tv. Inspectors are employed by using a organization known as Capita, which is a for profit business enterprise sub reduced in size by television licensing agency and are paid a general cash with commission for every licence evader they seize or licence that they sell. These humans haven't any extra authorized rights past that of any member of the public, so they have no extra correct to enter your home or query you about your television than say your postman or milkman. If you don't consider secure allowing them to into your dwelling, and even speakme to them, you might be underneath most likely no obligation to do so. These inspectors haven't any correct to demand entry, unless they're in possession of a valid search warrant which might be issued by way of a court as a part of the Police & criminal evidence Act and they would have to be accompanied by way of a policeman.

Answer 4

It should now go to the private sector.The problem with the BBC is that it tries to keep up with the independants which is not possible that was never its aim.Then we have news 24 which is boring and competes with many independents throughout the world,likes of Sky,CNN etc.Tell me why we should fund TV and Radio for the rest of the world.On the hand regional programmes offer the public a lot in ways of entertainment and local views.It is an outdated organisation which needs a good shake up and an end to Licence fees.

Answer 5

The BBC is good value for money (apart from Radio 1, "1Xtra", Deadenders, Russell Brand, fatty Wogan, Radio 5, BBC3, Fat slob Moyles and twatty Chris Evans).

Unfortunately I am still having to pay for all the crap on ITV, Channel 4, Sky, etc. that I don't even watch, and it costs me a damned sight more than the BBC costs.

It's just not fair.

Answer 6

It's outdated and I think should be illegal.

It's no different than me bringing out a product, doesn't matter what it is, and the the government passing a law saying that everyone HAS to have one of these and pay through the nose for it, or they go to jail. Can you imagine if they tried doing it with any other product? (after all, it's what the beeb is at the end of the day.) If the beeb get it, why not force us all to buy sky? or Bransons TV? Or how about forcing us all to pay for ... well you get my point. They can only get away with it because people in this country are too willing to bend over and take it.

Answer 7

There are aspects of the licensing I agree with. The BBC do a lot of work for adult literacy and supply libraries with a lot of materials for this.

They also run things like 'Breathing Places' again, in close co-operation with libraries and these can only be commended.

BUT it isn't worth £11 a month!

I object becuase they make money selling their programmes to the UKTV who then charge us again to watch them!

They pay people inflated salaries.

I appreciate not having products advertised between the programmes but they do spend a lot of time advertising their own up coming programmes.

Answer 8

I agree, or failing that people should be able to opt out of receiving the BBC which is the only channel(s) who get funding from the licence fee. i.e. If you want to receive the BBC channels you can pay a licence fee to see them, much like a subscription to sky or if you'd prefer not to you can have a TV but not receive the BBC channels on it.

Answer 9

in the united kingdom, a television licence is needed for each significant different and youngsters the place television programmes are watched as they're broadcast, regardless of the sign technique (terrestrial, satellite tv for pc, cable or the internet). A licence isn't required, although, in case you utilize your television in basic terms to video reveal DVDs or play video games, or you in basic terms watch programmes on your pc while they have been shown on television. Inspectors are employed by skill of a company observed as Capita, it relatively is a for earnings company sub shriveled by skill of television licensing organization and are paid a common gross revenues with fee for each licence evader they seize or licence that they sell. those human beings haven't any extra legal rights previous that of any member of the typical public, so as that they don't have from now on appropriate to pass into your place or question you approximately your television than say your postman or milkman. in case you do no longer sense comfortable allowing them to into your place, or perhaps chatting with them, you're below actually no legal duty to accomplish that. those inspectors haven't any appropriate to call for get right of entry to, except they're in possession of a valid seek warrant which could be issued by skill of a court docket as component of the Police & criminal data Act and that they could prefer to be observed by skill of a policeman.

Answer 10

exactly right why should we pay for a license?BBC seem to do more repeats than new programs there lots of other channels to watch so why have a monopoly on a licence??time BBC came into 21 st century and go commercial if they did they would lose money and where would the jobs go same as every where else when company goes down.get rid of fee and let public have some more money in their pockets.