Bearing in mind 30 odd people had access to this car.
Rather than dismissing it as ludicrous rubbish I think I would be down the police station demanding to know which of these 30 people could have killed my daughter because I had nothing to do with it.
It isn't impossible that one of their associates could have used this car to move the body and yet they seem too busy defending themselves to accept the evidence in the boot may be correct and someone close to them knows more than them.
2007-10-18 00:18:18 · 6 answers · asked by snaffle 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Very good question! The Macbeth's [sorry McCann's] they doth protest not enough for my liking!
2007-10-18 00:21:32 · answer #1 · answered by Two Pints Lager 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
When you say 30 odd people had access to the car, what do you mean? When they hired the car, i am sure that the insurance for the said vehicle would have just been for him and her, rather than anybody else, so if this is the case, why were the McCanns allowing these people to drive an uninsured car around.
Regarding your point about questioning their friends, they would have to be careful about upsetting them. The term house of cards springs to mind here. One crumbles, they all go.
This supposed dna evidence under the boot carpet is going to be quite damming for them.
Not even Perry Mason will get them off this one.
2007-10-18 00:28:37 · answer #2 · answered by archieis42 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
McGuilty
2007-10-18 00:29:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because they already know who did it
2007-10-18 00:53:50 · answer #4 · answered by Chris 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Maybe they did, Snaffle, and each of their friends had good alibis.
2007-10-18 00:34:05 · answer #5 · answered by Faith 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
you have made me think now
2007-10-18 00:44:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋