Was it just after she was left and dissappeared? It's just that, the people who were SUPPOSED to be RESPONSIBLE for her, said the DNA, in the hire car, came from her unwashed clothes, so why wash the toy, the last thing she held, and not her clothes?
2007-10-17 23:27:10 · 10 answers · asked by Chris 6 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I wouldn't have washed my baby away. That's all she had left. I used to sleep with my unwashed husbands jumper when he worked away. FOR FOUR DAYS
2007-10-17 23:53:32 · update #1
Probably as soon as Kate realised that the police might need it to do forensic tests on it.
2007-10-17 23:51:38 · answer #1 · answered by trancebabe 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
More than likely, the clothes would have been confiscated "after" British ferencics arrived on the scene. All the DNA would prove is that the child was in the rental car and that does not conclude a murder took place by any means. It just helps to piece together a hopeless trail of conjectures administered by good guessers...
Like myself and others here, we never get all the details and find our guesses are every bit as reliable as those doing so professionally...lol
Meanwhile, for the mother to carry that toy around was just a gimmick to grab sympathetic viewpoints from the world populace. Naturally, the toy would possibly have a certain amount of dirtiness and this certainly would be negative to a caring mother appearance and so she washed it, obviously...
Meanwhile, what true caring mother would leave two young children un-attended in a hotel room even tho being dining elsewhere in the same hotel...? Every hotel in the world has availability to sitters and, as she is a frequent traveler, then she is well aware of that...!
The real question is "Where did she dump the body...?"
The Portugal police does have limitations and did the right thing for calling for outside help while yet even Portugal laws have limitations they must adhere to...
sobeit...
2007-10-18 02:58:44 · answer #2 · answered by farplaces 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Freedom isn't my arguement, however the undeniable deline of public colleges is. I sorry i do no longer understand what u . s . a . you're in yet in u . s . public education is terrible. i comprehend I went to three, i become additionally homeschooled, and private college. in case you could no longer arise with the money for a powerful inner maximum college or get your baby a scholarship to a minimum of one be certain you homeschool. do no longer SACRIFICE your little ones TO PUBLIC colleges!!! ok- disgrace on me for the extremist fact. fairly there are some reliable public colleges, blue ribbon colleges i think they are noted as. yet fairly noticeably once you're on the decrease end of the financial stratus public education can fairly suck. i comprehend lots of individuals went to public college while they have been youthful, yet believe me the each little thing has replaced. there is far less government help, much less parental involvement, and lots extra undesirable little ones that intrude with the childs discovering ecosystem. clever little ones are held from exceling because of the fact the instructions are too sluggish, and the youngsters that want extra help do no longer continuously get it. Now an afternoon the class effortless in a freshman college path is sixty 5% because of the fact the scholars are no longer academically arranged. What does it propose while a college remedial path must be chop up into 2 stages because of the fact the scholars can slightly accomplish the main effortless algebra? base line numerous public colleges in basic terms are not as much as par. living house college is a amazing atlernative.
2016-12-29 16:19:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was washed in Portugal as it was grubby & sticky from little fingers.
An error of judgement by Kate to have done this, but she did it, and I can understand why. She wanted it clean to take around with her. It had been put high up on a shelf by the abductor, out of maddies reach. It's such a shame she washed it... the abductors DNA was on there. I bet she regrets washing it now, just to make it smell nicer. She obviously wasn't thinking clearly.
Kids toys can be very dirty as we all know. Go to any boot fair and take a look at the filth on some of the bears etc that people expect you to BUY!!
2007-10-17 23:50:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
It was said to have been washed twice because it had sun lotion on it.
I don't "think" I'd have washed it, but I might have -after all I'd still have my daughter's unwashed clothes to smell if I wanted to, so I don't think it's necessarily suspicious that Kate McCann did wash Cuddle Cat.
It COULD be suspicious, but then it could also be as KM said -that it was dirty. She was carrying it around a lot, and she wasn't carrying the clothes around.
.
2007-10-17 23:38:39 · answer #5 · answered by Netty 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Kate McCann obviously dosnt wash clothes very often, her clothes apparantly smelt of the dead bodies she had been dealing with as a part time GP a week or so before she even went on holiday....
2007-10-17 23:41:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
The little pink soft toy, CuddleCat, as Madeleine called it, was carried around a lot by Kate. She said having Madeleine's favourite toy around her, comforted her. Which is natural.
Sean & Amelie, Madeleine's little brother & sister, it seems took great pride in looking after CuddleCat for their beloved big sister. They look after her toy till she returns.
I presume Kate washed it for the same reason most Mums wash their little ones' soft toys. 'Cos they catch so much dust & dirt & to keep her twins safe from it. Am sure it must have hurt her to do it. But she did for her twins' sake.
Kate McCanns has plenty of her Madeleine's clothes to hold & comfort herself with...
2007-10-17 23:57:31 · answer #7 · answered by Faith 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I think it was washed after the Portuguese police ran their tests, which was some time after Madeleine went missing.
2007-10-17 23:37:25 · answer #8 · answered by Skidoo 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
i wouldnt wash it either
2007-10-18 00:07:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
FANTASTIC someone else that is not blind to it all xxxxxxxx
2007-10-17 23:35:31 · answer #10 · answered by sexy hotrod 4 · 7⤊ 2⤋