He was not a classical Marxist, only a Stalinist, who believed in "top-down" reforms rather than the workers themselves taking the lead... but that's better than nothing and sometimes those are the choices we're presented.
Hero. However flawed he was, a hero.
2007-10-19 12:26:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dont Call Me Dude 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Terrorist.
2007-10-18 05:16:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Max A 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
sorry but to go about reform with deadly intent make you a terrorist...
sorry to all his supporters clearly it is all about wieghing up the value you place on human life vs your own intentions be it good or otherwise
Clearly to see the loss of human life to gain an end is terrorism.
Human life is precious no matter how good the cause.
2007-10-18 20:32:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i really dont know, but the 3rd world countries in general like him,
2007-10-18 05:18:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Uncle Under 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Rebel with a cause .
2007-10-18 05:19:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by orange 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
terrorist
hero to some
2007-10-18 05:16:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋