English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So, say you're making a turn @ 25mph and someone falls out of your passenger side door because the seatbelt was jammed in the door, and the passenger was 18 years of age or older.

Should the driver be held responsible for her injuries, and would the girl have a case to sue you with?

I live in Oregon, if anyone is familiar with the laws here.

2007-10-17 20:01:42 · 8 answers · asked by J Payne 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

Yeah, that's how it is here too. If you're the driver, and you have someone under the age of 18 not wearing their seatbelt, the driver gets the ticket. But if they are of age 18 and older, they get the ticket.

2007-10-17 20:09:56 · update #1

8 answers

This scenario could go on, and on. Why did the door suddenly open?. Are you operating an unsafe motor vehicle?. You see where I'm going. Give all the specifics, and I'll give you a professional answer. Email me when your question is exact, and I'll edit my answer.

2007-10-17 21:03:29 · answer #1 · answered by CGIV76 7 · 0 0

The driver should not be held responsible unless they were found to be at fault with the driving laws in the state.

As far as I know the driver is NOT responsible for passenger seat belts. The police will actually ticket the passengers in MA.

2007-10-17 20:06:02 · answer #2 · answered by danksquish 3 · 0 0

In this state the driver is responsible. The OR law just says all passengers must wear belts, so I'm assuming they would hold the driver responsible.

2007-10-17 20:11:58 · answer #3 · answered by barbara 7 · 0 0

im not sure about Oregon.. but where I live, theres a double fine if the cops catch your passenger without a seat belt on.. And rightfully so, because the driver is responsible for the same.

2007-10-17 20:07:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The driver is usually responsible for the conduct of his/her passengers. In the case of an adult, the adult is also jointly responsible. More responsible parties = less chance of problems.

this is in general, I don't know about Oregon

2007-10-17 20:24:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Seatbelt regulations are there to shop lives. regrettably they do one in each and every of those great job that folk now see them as stressful. enable me to describe some thing you will possibly no longer know. in case you sit down in the front seat and the guy(or dogs) in the lower back would not have a seatbelt, and you're then in an accident, you're 5 cases extra possibly to go through severe dying or harm. devoid of the seatbelt, the guy in the lower back of the vehicle is thrown forward and smashes into your cranium. I comprehend your good judgment. You harm your shoulder worse than in case you had no seatbelt on. Seatbelts do reason soreness. the explanation the regulation tells you to positioned on a seatbelt is the comparable reason the regulation says your motor vehicle ought to be roadworthy, the line ought to be solid, the fee ought to be smart, and you have been given the splendid tocontinual via the granting of a drivers licence. devoid of those you mightcontinual in a international of chaos. the fee of taking good care of a individual who would not positioned on a seatbelt and suffers strategies injury from the accident ends up in up $10 million in keeping with individual, possibly extra. A driving force's licence isn't a precise. that's a privilege. under the privilege of having a driving force's licence, you're required to stay with each and every of the regulations that bypass alongside with the regulations of that state or u . s .. and seem at it yet otherwise. If no person wore seatbelts, injuries and deaths might improve, and your insurances might bypass in the process the roof and so might your taxes to pay for his or her healthcare, and a few of your friends and relatives may be lifeless. I even have been in diverse injuries, all led to via the different motor vehicle. the only motor vehicle that did no longer have seatbelts(while i replaced into 11) led to me to be thrown onto the line and my physique torn aside. the upward thrust in injury to my physique replaced into great. The fool who led to the accident wore a seatbelt and had no injuries.

2016-10-04 01:55:23 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

as the driver, you are responsible for your passengers. you are responsible for your car tags, your headlights, your turning signals...cops can pull you over for anything as long as they have probable cause. you have a burned out light and get pulled over...the police can start the list from there...drugs, alcohol, firearms...the list is unlimited.

2007-10-17 20:16:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is not about a "ticket", this is about the potential lawsuit or criminal charges for her injuries, so the 18-year rule will not apply.

2007-10-17 21:43:40 · answer #8 · answered by OC 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers