2007-10-17 18:42:48 · 11 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
sfaa (below) Incorrect. My question boils down to;
"yada yada yada yada yada yada and so forth"
2007-10-17 18:56:30 · update #1
Yes, but we must cut out services in order of expense. That one will come much, much later.
2007-10-17 18:45:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
component of the rationalization for that's that the government salaries make up a incredibly small share of the excellent funds. no longer too plenty could be saved by skill of reducing the city government salaries different than greater advantageous exposure....it truly is a qualitative situation better than a quantitative situation......it truly is an argument of ethical tone for my section they might desire to do the two, cut back the government salaries or deny fee of residing will advance till the funds is fixed and it relatively is not comparable to inner maximum marketplace because of the fact the government worker jobs are to no longer produce earnings, yet to manage centers in accordance with rules
2016-10-13 01:06:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The rationale for such ostentation goes all the way back to Washington. Heads of state were expected to travel in style, so Washington had an elaborate coach drawn by matched white horses. Today, you don't have coaches so much (unless your English Royalty), but motorcades and jets have taken thier place as far as maintaining the dignity of the office goes.
2007-10-18 07:21:54 · answer #3 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chi-Guy.
No! ! !
The motorcade is necessary to funnel people in front of the Presidential Limousine so that Bush Sr. and Dubya can spit on the bodies as the Limo rolls over them.
Nice tatoo, or is that the tire marks on your back?
Thanks for asking.
2007-10-17 19:06:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, why should I have to keep paying for all these special government services. Plus it stops traffic and interferes with daily life. God prevented the pope and Ronald Reagan from getting killed by the assassin's bullet, what, Bush doesn't have that type of faith? He's not a true Christian?
2007-10-17 18:51:15 · answer #5 · answered by Earl Grey 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually, neo-cons are very buddy-buddy with their liberal friends and spend tax-payer money freely.
You're mixing them up with the old conservatives, who believed in individual freedom and responsibility, and in limited government.
An old concept, which I'm sure is no longer taught in public schools. (Too dangerous for the State.)
2007-10-17 19:01:13 · answer #6 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say they hate unnecessary government expenses, so no, they would not cut that out of the budget.
Of course, they get to decide what is unnecessary.
2007-10-17 18:49:03 · answer #7 · answered by Still Learning 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They might try cutting the private jet flights of NP too!
2007-10-17 18:50:02 · answer #8 · answered by question212 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes, just use the bus (soybean powered). the secret service has been outta job since the end of the cold war...
2007-10-17 18:47:51 · answer #9 · answered by Mongol 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Only if they are covering Hillary.
2007-10-17 18:48:34 · answer #10 · answered by charlie the 2na 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋