2007-10-17 16:33:14 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Yeah mild_irritant, Facts Would Be Nice.
2007-10-17 16:42:36 · update #1
I believe that if one had facts, this would be validating the truth, not the opinion.
If the opinion is based on facts, aren't we really looking for truth, not necessarily to validate the opinion?
2007-10-22 08:01:58 · answer #1 · answered by Psychic Cat 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
With facts.
2007-10-17 23:36:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Whaaaa....
are you talking about Bill O'Reilly, or Bill Maher?
I know, the President. You can believe the President, can't you?
2007-10-17 23:53:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
US Supreme Court!
2007-10-17 23:35:33 · answer #4 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say it could also be validated with the accepted and existing long time-honoured doctrines and principles.
Thanks for asking. Have a great day!
2007-10-18 01:11:57 · answer #5 · answered by Third P 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋