I was thinking about this....seriously, there both so similar its.....
SCARY! But are they really different?
2007-10-17 15:36:09 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yin & Yang?
2007-10-17 15:38:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
You know, irony doesn't mean your pants aren't wrinkled. Many others have already pointed out the obvious, which is that Colbert is a comedian playing a part and Coulter is an evil, mean-spirited, lying hypocrite who actually seems to believe what she says. I'd say the primary differnece, though, is that given a choice as to which one I'd prefer to get romantic with, I'd go with Colbert, and I'm straight. Coulter is like the Emporer from Star Wars; the longer she stares into the face of evil, the more unattractive she gets. And what does she weight, about 75 pounds? I've never found scarecrows (and it occurs to me that that analogy fits on so many levels when talking about Coultergeist) at all attractive.
2007-10-17 16:58:01 · answer #2 · answered by thrillhaus 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stephen Colbert's show is a parody of the O'Reilly Factor. Ann Coulter's writings and speeches are satirical. The idea is the same, but the method is different.
2007-10-17 15:56:44 · answer #3 · answered by Matt W 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Colbert is a nice guy with a great sense of humor and considerable comic talent.
Ann Coulter is an insensitive, mean-spirited viper who will say whatever she thinks, no matter how racist, cruel or hateful, that will put another dollar in her pocket and get her media attention.
I'd like to know why in the world you think there are any similarities between these two individuals. They are polar opposites in the spectrum of humanity.
2007-10-17 15:41:33 · answer #4 · answered by grrluknow 5 · 9⤊ 0⤋
Colbert is a comedian playing a part, a parody of a right wing pundant, he is actually very liberal IRL.
Ann Coulter is a right wing pundant and a seriously way over to the right one at that.
2007-10-17 15:58:29 · answer #5 · answered by vegan_geek 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
that isn't any longer in the slightest degree surprising. Coulter is only a charicature of the american top - hateful, mendacity, and afraid. Her tactic of asserting further and further and more suitable outrageous and offensive issues wears skinny after a lengthy time period. in truth she's saturated the dislike marketplace. Colbert is in basic terms finished of witty satire, and that is strong to verify that more suitable human beings desire witty satire to hateful satire. in basic terms were given my replica of Colbert's e book the day earlier to this, and that i'm searching ahead to interpreting it!
2016-10-21 08:29:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Colbert can take on serious politics with a little humor. Coulter just spews hate that she can't even write herself.
2007-10-17 15:45:25 · answer #7 · answered by Senator D*L*P™ 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Stephen Colbert is a Comedian.
2007-10-17 15:39:09 · answer #8 · answered by diaboloist99 3 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Colbert is 100% sarcasism. Coulter is serious.
2007-10-17 15:54:27 · answer #9 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Coulter is a Conservative making fun of Liberals.
Colbert is a Liberal acting like a Stereotyped Conservative to make fun of Conservatives.
2007-10-17 15:39:10 · answer #10 · answered by Jon M 4 · 9⤊ 1⤋
The primary difference is that Coulter is actually serious.
2007-10-17 15:52:50 · answer #11 · answered by Earl Grey 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋