What do you think of Ellen DeGeneres' dog being taken away?

Answer 1

It's a stupid situation! The animal shelter should have left the dog with the family. Ellen did what any common sense person would have done. She did violate the contract; the animal shelter is legally correct. However, being legally correct does not make it right!

Answer 2

There are two sides to every story and we've only heard Ellen's. The tidbits I have heard from the rescue agency's side (from Greta's show on FoxNews last night) certainly have slid the scale in their favor as far as I'm concerned.

Basically, the new report from them is that when Ellen explained the dog was with another family, they asked that the new family come in and fill out an application and they refused to do so. So, neither Ellen nor this new family did anything according to the rules and so the dog was removed.
A hard truth but it was legally and ethically the right thing to do. I love that the celebrities are slowly learning that they need to play by the rules just like us ordinary people.

Answer 3

Mutts and mothers Rescue did provide the hairdressers relatives the prospect to undertake Iggy the splendid way. The legal professional for Mutts and mothers replaced into on Fox information and he has emails asserting the hairdressers relatives does no longer fill out the adoption utility, and did no longer opt to return homestead for the homestead bypass to to be achieved. They have been given the prospect to do it the splendid way via Mutts and mothers, yet for the reason that they had the means of Ellen DeGeneres in the back of them, they did no longer do what replaced into mandatory to undertake Iggy, legally from M&M. If somebody yanked you around like that, and does no longer follow technique while given the prospect to achieve this, i'm particular you will possibly have achieved precisely what Mutts and mothers did, and take the dogs lower back.

Answer 4

I really hate how this was turned into a huge issue. Ellen used her fame to try to win back the dog....and also, makes her more famous. Nice advertisement there ellen. Rules are rules. If the pet center agreed to return the dog for ellen to decide who to take, then other people will do the same thanks to ellen >_<.... therefore, you lose ellen and get over it!!!

Answer 5

The whole thing is so weird-why not let the person she gave the dog to keep it. The way she was hysterically crying over the situation was the weirdest...a lil over the top to me...she didn't even have the dog but for 2 weeks and i am sure it will be taken care of -its from a rescue where they don't kill the animals and i guess they are taking it back to be "rescued" yet again...

Answer 6

I agree with Yusuke. The only side that was heard was Ellen's. Now that shelter whose soul mission is to rescue dogs is seen under a bad light. There are two sides to every story. Tears doesn't eliminate the other side. Talk about manipulation.

Answer 7

oh. it is a sad thing and frustrating too but at times, we really are not in control of some situations that come into our lives,
and we have to accept that with all humility.

Answer 8

i find it really sad!!! she couldnt keep the dog so she gave it someone who wud really appreciate it, if she told the place where she got it they probably would have taken it back, i dont think its right give the dog back!

Answer 9

ummmm i dunno.....well i never saw her as a cryer even though everyone cries....it was really sad tho

Answer 10

Sad .....