As a registered democrat (former righty), and a girl. Is it strange that I don't like HIllary? I like Bill to a point. But after what bush has done to this country I am registered as a democrat now.
I do like Ron Paul though. Bu am interested in knucniak or Mike Gravel. Hillary is too close to Bush IMO. I really tink she has sold out to them along with "holy Joe" libermann.
Matter of fact Bush and poo poo flower both in effect endorsed hillary. They need an anagonist. She is the one they wnat. very odd.
2007-10-17 14:48:42 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Indeed. I don't like her either. She is a republicrat. Ron Paul has some good ideas, but is a wacko. Kucinich is great, but the dems would NEVER give him the ticket...they should, but they won't. Vote Pacific Green Party, they offer a true liberal choice.
2007-10-17 14:52:42 · answer #1 · answered by prekinpdx 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well, I don't think there is anything wrong with opposing Hillary. Afterall, she isn't really against the Iraq War (you won't find any anti-war Democrats outside of Kucinich or Gravel), even though he is perceived to be. Hillary's "Family Entertainment Protection Act," which was a federal version of a censorship law that had repeatedly been deemed unconstitutional at the state level before she proposed it, was cosponsored by one Joseph Lieberman.
Realistically, the only way to get an anti-war president in the White House is to switch to the Republicans and vote for Ron Paul, as Kucinich and Gravel don't really have a chance in the primaries. Ron Paul merely needs to upset Romney in Iowa or New Hampshire, prevent Fred Thompson from winning all the southern primaries, and beat Rudy Giuliani in New York, New Jersey, or Pennsylvania to neutralize all 3 of his main rivals (McCain is already pretty much done because he is bankrupt). He has the money to pull it off, but he needs all the support he can get.
2007-10-17 22:07:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not strange at all. I am a female democrat, and can't stand Hillary Clinton. She's been dishonest in previous business dealings, she is abrasive, callous, self-absorbed, cold, calculating, devious, and so on.
I would respect her more if she would have divorced her idiot husband. Can't stand him, either.
I'm not fond of President Bush, he's ignorant, and doesn't care.
I do like Fred Thompson, and his ideals. He's for term limits in Congress and all politics. I think he'd be good for the country. (He's a nice man, too.) He is from Lawrenceburg, TN, and I live slightly north of there.
He's looking out for the whole country, not just rich people or his friends, or personal agendas, like Pres. Bush and Mrs. Clinton.
I believe in voting for the person, not the political party.
2007-10-17 21:59:46 · answer #3 · answered by Debra S 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't consider it odd at all that you can think for yourself. To me it's odd when people can't or won't. What's wrong with them?
I think Hillary is similar to the President in some ways. I think they both side with BIG business, and I voted for Bush. Both of them are for immigration reform and visas that would also benefit big corporations' desire for cheap labor. And Bush seems to like Hillary for some reason. I wonder if he recognizes the similarities also.
Although I don't care for Ron Paul, I can understand why you are checking him out. I'm still checking them out myself.
2007-10-17 22:53:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No not odd, Just smart.... Ron Paul is good but you might want to do a little research on all the candidates... Than make a choice and don't listen to the media they have their own agenda... Go the candidates web sites and see what each one stands for...
2007-10-17 21:57:30 · answer #5 · answered by diva102288 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vote for who you want to vote for. If you don't see anyone in the Democratic Party and someone in the Republican Party, then vote for him or her.
This is what has happened to this country due the the bush administration - it forced everyone to take sides, or worse, people place you on one side or the other if you don't agree with just one of their platforms.
2007-10-17 21:58:28 · answer #6 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not odd
it does show you are intelligent enough to not believe everything you are told
I urge you to look closer at ron paul and give him your support
I believe he is the best candidate I have seen
kucinich supports the eradication of the constitution
whereas Dr. Paul is a true patriot who wants what is best for all Americans
2007-10-18 01:59:32 · answer #7 · answered by 1 free American 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are for Ron Paul you are no Democrat! That is all we need, another Republican! Paul gained his reputation as "Dr. No"with his contrarian insistence on "never vot!ing] for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized by the Constitution! He is pro death penalty and anti pro choice! We have had enough Republican nut cases!
2007-10-17 23:08:31 · answer #8 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is nothing in her resume that puts her in the category of president. She has let men fool her her whole life. She stands for Nothing. She says whatever Polls tell her to say. She has no real answers. The Media has given her a pass. She has major flaws and only an idiot would vote for her.
2007-10-17 21:53:36 · answer #9 · answered by carolinatinpan 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You are not odd. I am a woman and I honestly liked Hilary better when she was first lady. I don't trust her because of her support for the war initially, and I don't like the stance she has taken on foreign relations (which are going to need repairing BIG time thanks to our current idiot president!)
2007-10-18 09:15:23 · answer #10 · answered by Lady J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋