2, 2, 16. Of course, those round numbers don't make a lot of sense with 21 respondents...
2007-10-17 14:34:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by arkleseizure 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
21
2007-10-17 14:35:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Twilight182 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
21
2007-10-17 14:35:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
This question makes no sense. 10% of 21 is 2.1. And someone can't be .1 of a person. But anyway:
2.1 said A
2.1 said B
and 16.8 said C
2007-10-17 14:36:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
3=A,3=B, 15=C
2007-10-17 14:37:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sarah B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
100%
2007-10-17 14:34:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ralphie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
that's my answer, i'm no longer assured that it relatively is appropriate: It desires 20N to stretch 10cm (30cm - 20cm), so it desires approximately 2N to stretch each and every cm (20/10) between 30cm and 35 cm is 5cm (35cm-30cm), so it desires 10N to stretch from 30cm to 35cm (2N*5)
2016-10-13 00:31:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
87 people answerd yes
2007-10-17 14:36:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Fredrik IV 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
LMAO 16.8 PEOPLE?
a tenth of a person... haha.
2007-10-17 14:35:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by mle 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
ummm well without chopping pplz in half, (rounding) id say 4,4,17?
2007-10-17 14:36:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by kettlechips k 1
·
0⤊
0⤋