English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If the solution is the same, the question does not matter.
If the solutions are different, it means that the overload of CO2 creates a different problem if man-made, or notl.
Which is right or logical?

2007-10-17 14:05:45 · 7 answers · asked by baypointmike 3 in Science & Mathematics Earth Sciences & Geology

7 answers

Break the question down to something easier to comprehend.

If you smoked cigarettes and they began making you sick, would you keep smoking?

Now, suppose you get a disease that you could get naturally? If smoking made the disease worse, would you continue smoking?

So, if humans are the main cause of global warming, shouldn't we do stuff to limit our impact? If it's a natural process, and our industrial society is adding further insult to injury should we change our ways?

Whether natural or man-made it benefits us, all living things, and the planet if we limit our impact on nature.

2007-10-17 14:12:11 · answer #1 · answered by dgrhm 5 · 1 0

certainly it does. Look at the data. Global temp and co2 levels do not remotely coincide. it doesnt do any good to change the oil when the car is out of gas. It is very likely that global warming is a product of changes in solar output and is completely out of our control. While I am all in favor of protecting our environment and getting away from fossil fuels, I do not think crippling our economy to pursue a completely ineffective solution to global warming is cost effective.

2007-10-17 14:10:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

GLOBAL WARMING DOES NOT EXIST! The Earth goes in patterns. Every few thousand years the Earth warms and freezes over. Global Warming is a way for scientist to make money.

2007-10-17 14:09:02 · answer #3 · answered by Mike 1 · 0 1

Weather monitoring stations that used to be in the middle of nowhere are now in the middle of a paved mall parking lot.
If you are not comparing the same thing how can you tell if one is different? The temp in that spot may be the same as is used to be if the area wasn't paved.

2007-10-17 14:11:36 · answer #4 · answered by t. B 5 · 0 1

dgrhm is correct.

Best answer so far - the rest are missing important data and the logical interpretation of all the data.

Whereas dgrhm has provided realistic clarification.

Thanks for the logical analysis dgrhm.

2007-10-17 14:38:11 · answer #5 · answered by joss 3 · 0 0

global warming is a complete scam. i have heard many different ways global warming works and can tell that nobody really agrees and there is no logicality about it.

2007-10-17 14:09:41 · answer #6 · answered by rdsxrule117 3 · 0 1

niether,I think!!!!

2007-10-17 14:08:44 · answer #7 · answered by Williew 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers