is only saying she can't get the dog back, because they want the publicity?
That's what it seems like to me...I mean, it's just a DOG. As long as it has a home, who really cares?
2007-10-17 13:50:43 · 6 answers · asked by Qu'est ce que tu penses? 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Mutts and Mom is being insensitive to the family that Ellen gave the dog to and had already started to bond with.
2007-10-17 14:01:26 · answer #1 · answered by HoneyBunny 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the media needs to pick their battles. This whole thing should have NEVER gone to press. If Ellen violated a technicality in an agreement...that's one thing. But the news and tabloids think they got a "Big score" out of this. Though i'm not a rabid Ellen fan, i think she was acting in genuine interest of the dog , and she wouldn't just throw a dog at an undeserving family. I don't blame the dog company - they were just following a contract / agreement, and i believe they never wanted this to go beyond a local / county level. But the media scans public records to see what they can get, and THAT was the problem. Whoever dug this up in hopes of making it "National Fodder" are the real scumbags...
2007-10-17 14:04:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I Dount it, if they were looking for publicity, then they got the wrong kind. They have recieved numerous death threats and obscene messages, besides the adoption thing is a free service they provide, the supply part is where they make the money. No company wants negative publicity....
2007-10-17 13:58:49 · answer #3 · answered by Kevin G 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think those two ladies that own that place are mean and over the top b*t*h*s. They are way too extreme and I would never consider doing business with them.
2007-10-17 13:54:37 · answer #4 · answered by bigDcowgirl 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the whole thing is a publicity stunt.
2007-10-17 13:53:11 · answer #5 · answered by Aloha_Ann 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They should give the little girls the dog.
2007-10-17 13:56:39 · answer #6 · answered by a p 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋