Bush says threat of World War III if Iran goes nuclear. Is he right? Do you think Bush should use airstrikes?

Question

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20071017/tts-uk-iran-bush-ca02f96_1.html

Answer 1

Has Bush made ONE correct decision since he has been President? Hell NO! He is not right and no he should not use airstrikes. The majority of the American people disagree with his decisions. He seems not to care and has a relentless tirade to start wars around the world. He has nearly bankrupt the US and vetoes bills for our own citizens. Yet, he does not blink an eye to ask for trillions of dollars to fund the first senseless war he started. He is paranoid that every country has weapons of mass destruction and invokes lies and innuendo with his staff members (which many have taken blame and resigned) Yet, why is he not impeached? I think he seriously needs a mental evaluation.

Answer 2

the neocons and the PNAC group are talking bullshite, Iran have Russia and China as allies, Iran is stronger than Iraq and Afghanistan put together. Furthermore China and Russia have permanent seats on the UN so they will use their political power to block Bush. The American people and Congress do not want war with Iran, Bush will have to win at home first. Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney are living in a Dr Strangelove fantasy world where they assume wrongly in the words of former warmonger Nixon "The President can bomb who he wants ! ". Fortunately they cant bomb who they want anymore even though they got away with Iraq.

It seems we are heading backward to the cold war days with neo cons trying to establish Islam as the new communism, on side you have an american people dictated to by the Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney business dictat and the other side , Iran backed by Russia and China. Hopefully the mere idea of confrontation with Russia , China on an economic, militaristic and political front will scare the Bush dictatorship into leaving office quietly at the end of his final term.

Also it seems that Gordon Brown is trying his hardest to remove british troops from Iraq and distance britain from Bush foreign policy. Hopefully Britain will not offfer any support to the Bush dictatorship against Iran.

Answer 3

Well, the way I see it, someone will have to make that decision.
It won't be me.
It will be the people who ran for Office and assumed the responsibility of handling such matters.
Back when I was in high school, the Iranians took a few hundred people hostage and tormented many of them for well over a year.
At my high school, we constructed a life-like dummy of the then leader of Iran and strung it up in front of the school.
Photos were taken and published in the local paper and the photo was page one in the yearbook.
Back then we were proud citizens.
Today we've got a bunch of candy-asses.

Answer 4

I wouldn't be surprised at anything idiot Bush did! But it would be another illegal war and if Brown had any sense he would tell Bush the best place to stick his bomb.

The awful thing about weaponry is that you can't have them and then moan that those you perceive as your enemies also have them. Bush is full of hypocracy. Israel should be left to fight her own battles now. If American money and support hadn't been so easily available, maybe the middle east would settle down a bit, once they have blown each other to oblivian! But that is their choice and we should keep out of it.

Answer 5

Whatever Bush says or thinks is usually the exact opposite of the way it really is. I think he'll use air strikes on Iran just so he and his cronies can benefit financially from all the no bid contracts he'll sign.

Answer 6

Bush lives in a `world of his own`where he thinks he can say and do what he likes without consequence. When if ever is he going to learn other wise? He has been the instigator of two middle Eastern wars, is he going for a hat-trick?
I have many Iranian friends and it greatly saddens me to think that they might one day be classed as `my enemies` as a result of that dreadful mans` foreign policies.

Answer 7

If Iran goes nuclear and fullfills its promise to transparently pursue only peaceful use of nuclear technology, then the threat is much less.
We will never live in a risk free world so I think we should not strike.
--
If the U.S. is hit with a nuclear weapon, then we should make a comfortable peaceful life for the world impossible for a thousand years.
..mutual assured misery...

Answer 8

No Iran is stronger then Iraq and Afgahnostahn both of which we are poldding thru with have have many brave and competent man and women in our military but the draft dodging frat boy running the show can't even count to 3. Russia and China have both warned us about Iran as have our allies only Isreal is behind this it would be yet another disaster

Answer 9

As usual Bush is full of it. He is lying again, again ..........

To run bombing runs on Iran will be another war crime.

Why is America in so many wars? Look at the Arms Manufacturers' profits and their huge lobby.

3000+ troops dead -- another billion in profit.

Answer 10

At least he admits it would be that serious coz "Iran" ain't Iraq! However the rhetoric is exactly the same as the lead up to Iraq, i think this lot (neo cons) are stupid enough to follow through. Hopefully us Brits may be able to talk sense into this idiot "Bush." Come on Gordon Brown, bang some heads together.