on any given sunday anything is possible
2007-10-17 13:25:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jay Argentina 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Miami did manage to shut out the Pats last season (0-21); and the 2005 season beat the Pats in the final regular season game (26-28). However, this is an entirely different dynamic. The Brady/Moss duo is on fire. Not to mention the other weapons Brady has at his disposal - Stallworth, Welker, Gaffney, Faulk...and Miami just gave up Chris Chambers...the deck looks stacked against Miami. I think this will be a tremendously lopsided game of epic proportions.
2007-10-17 21:36:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by maadams2004 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Miami does have a successful record against the Pats. However, with Chambers gone, a back-up QB playing, a weak defense, New England should prevail.
2007-10-17 20:38:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Big D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah they beat the the Colts and the Bears last season, the two team who went on to play for the SuperBowl
not willing to bet money on it lol, but its possible
2007-10-18 00:24:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by beautyful_brown_eyez 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it was the Hurricanes or even the Miami (OH) Redhawks, they'd have a prayer.
But not the Dolphins.
2007-10-17 20:27:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are crazy. Miami could do the upsets when their defense was better but even that's gone to pot now.
2007-10-17 20:29:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by majestic kev 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It just shows they are good against the Colts.
2007-10-17 20:32:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Patsfan 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Anything is possible but its not likely unless the pats see it as a trap game.
2007-10-17 20:25:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cowboy87 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Crazy.
2007-10-17 20:23:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think so. They traded away a great offensive weapon in Chris Chambers to my Bolts. (hehehe...)
2007-10-17 20:24:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
well.......i think your crazy.but why dont you take those 3 to 1 odds and bet your house on it.or trailer
2007-10-17 20:41:16
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋