Royal Rumble
Wrestlemania
Summerslam
Survivor Series??????????????
2007-10-17 12:48:09 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
It was better with just 4 major ppv's...
2007-10-17 12:51:22 · update #1
I agree ... I'd like to see more King of the Ring Qualifier matches on Raw & SmackDown, with the semi-finals and finals happening on one of the PPVs you listed. I don't think KotR should have its own PPV.
2007-10-17 13:06:05 · answer #1 · answered by DeadSurvivor 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes WWE does have too many Pay Per View's but they started cutting down on PPV's, as now WWE has decided to cancel December to Dismember (December) and New Year's Revolution (January). So now they have the big four and minor PPV's.
January: Royal Rumble
February: No Way Out
March/April: WrestleMania XXIV (24)
April: Backlash
May: Judgment Day
June: One Night Stand & Vengeance
July: The Great American Bash
August: SummerSlam
September: Unforgiven
October: Cyber Sunday
November: Survivor Series
December: Armageddon
2007-10-17 13:02:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Way too many. Some times there's only three weeks between ppv's. It was better when they just had the big four. They had a lot more time to develope storylines between one ppv and the next. Now they have almost the same card 3 or 4 ppv's in a row.
2007-10-17 12:56:35 · answer #3 · answered by Steve 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I say 1 every 1.5 months. Not one every 3-4 weeks. I think 4 PPVs is a little to little. But I think there should be more championship matches on TV, Take out No Mercy, Judgement day, Unforgiven, GAB, and no Mercy and spread the rest around the year.
2007-10-17 13:08:21 · answer #4 · answered by Tyler 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, i liked it when it was just the orginial 4 , though I like No mercy, Unfogiven. There's too many PPV's an it takes away from the show by having big matches every 2 months or so. Later.
2007-10-17 15:07:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Totally agree with you. PPV's used to mean something. Now seems like Raw/Smackdown and ECW are nothing more than 2 hour commercials for upcoming PPV's with a few matches sprinkled in
2007-10-17 14:38:15 · answer #6 · answered by barry m 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
#a million.) what's your in demand present day WWE Pay consistent with View? -Royal Rumble, removing Chamber. #2.) apart from Wrestlemania, what's your in demand Pay consistent with View out of the "great 3": Royal Rumble, Survivor sequence or Summerslam? -Royal Rumble. It holds unique historic previous in it. #3.) who's your prediction to win the 2012 Royal Rumble? -Kane #4.) in case you could desire to upload any journey to the Survivor sequence 2011 card, what would or no longer it rather is? -u . s . Championship Triple probability: Dolph Ziggler (c) vs. Zack Ryder vs. John Morrison #5.) Who would be in touch interior the WWE Championship journey come Wrestlemania 28? -Rey Mysterio and Chris Jericho
2016-12-29 15:39:40 · answer #7 · answered by cantara 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
-Yes. So many people waste their money on them. I'd rather go back to the four main PPV's.
-The only reason they have so many is b/c Vince knows he can take advantage of WWE's fans and make money off them with bad cards.
2007-10-17 13:18:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes they have way too many right now. They need to have only 1 pay-per-view per month. Right now they have pay-per-views every 2 weeks basically.
2007-10-17 14:01:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes but for Good reason ya see the wwe makes money when people buy the package which is around $40.00 although wrestle mania goes for around $60.00 that's why u see something new every 2 weeks or so
2007-10-17 12:56:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋