I think at times -- very rarely -- it has a valid purpose.
But the number of situations where the govt absolutely needs to take private property -- and cannot find any other solution -- are a tiny fraction of the times govts do it because it's convenient and allowed.
2007-10-17 12:50:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Eminent Domain is one of the most abused legal ploys today.
Where is the wildest corners of some demented mind did it suddenly become OK for you to steal someones land, just because he bought it first and does not want to sell it to you for the price you have offered? That is exactly what has happened in countless cases where a private entity has used eminent domain to take away land held by one private individual and give it to a second private individual or company.
I do not care how much new tax money, how much good for the community or other CRAP they try to hang on it, it is legalized STEALING.
Eminent Domain should only be used to take land from private citizens for the benefit of the public and then only if the public is going to own the land after the taking. Such as for schools, highways or other public matters. NEVER to give one persons property to another private group or person.
It has been said that everyone has a price and everything is for sale. But if you are a developer that wants a bargain, you run to the local government and trump up some excuse to using eminent domain to steal the land, instead of having to pay the kind of price they should to get land they do not own.
2007-10-17 12:40:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mcgoo 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The founding fathers based the constitution on the right to own your property, by allowing eminent domain, especially the use of it to create shopping malls and chain stores is an outrage, and any politician that supports it should be exiled for betraying the principles of our country.
2007-10-17 12:46:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by scorch_22 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It should only be used in very rare and very specific circunstances. Not that travesty the Supreme Court has made of it in a recent decision.
2007-10-17 12:42:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by hironymus 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
a cutting-edge tale the place the government tried to proper materials for advertisement company weighed heavy interior the courts determination to diminish the gavel problematical on the government attempting to apply Eminent area. regardless of if this is for the stable of the regular public and private materials proprietors are provided a honest industry value...i will see a achievable choose for such...yet no longer purely to uproot a relatives without government tips.
2017-01-03 20:05:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋