She is no different than any other politician. She is just trying to buy votes.
2007-10-17 12:23:46 · 19 answers · asked by Dude #2369™ 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Only if their parents are registered voters.
2007-10-17 12:30:44 · answer #1 · answered by Dude 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
NO and Yes. Politics as usual. Just in pant suits vs the Cowboy Diplomacy* she recently referred to.
She had one who reportedly loves her Mother but does not like her. Straight from the horses mouth. If anyone cared about the poor children they would compromise the darn SCHIP Bill and lower the income range. Mandate restrictions and remove the Adults currently taking the higher percentage of funds while over a half million kids poor stay off the program? Try "Dial in" the President next time.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/10/20071017.html
Please read the President's News Conference for yourselves.
I just deplore the superficial answer with no details. Buy votes? Well look at the REAL life clearly and see perhaps ?? we change like the weather must mean something?! Mahalo.
2007-10-17 12:33:45 · answer #2 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hmmmm... do no longer you think of this could nicely be a stretch? I mean what if I asked: If conservatives love the warriors plenty then why did human beings like McCain and Bush no longer vote for the GI bill revisions or threaten to veto it? $4600 isn't something for those human beings. Politicians are no longer charity workers... they could be monks then. some intentionally help the detrimental (some Democrats and a few Republicans make law to assist the detrimental... yet no longer all of them... you're creating an extremely unfair and simplistic argument). needless to say the politicians that do could stay to tell the story interior the international of politics and could be sensible with regard to the appliance of their service.
2016-12-18 10:19:12 · answer #3 · answered by rosalee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All she cares about is furthering her agenda and power!
To the numbskulls that say Bush doesn't care for kids, because of his S-CHIP veto. You do realize that the poor children are still covered. Bush vetoed it because it would expand it to cover adults and children of families making up to $80k/year. Far more than enough to buy private insurance. The S-CHIP bill was just to expand government run healthcare, a stepping stone for universal health care, and to discourage people from buying insurance in the private market. How can you morons not see this? Are you liberals just blinded by the socialist glint in Hillary's eye?
2007-10-17 16:19:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
of course she doesn't.... and niether does her village...
oh... and FORD PERFECT...
You are way off on your answer to this question. If you researched it out at all... you would find that congress wanted to raise the age of a "child" to age 25 and they wanted to raise the Family income level to $83,000.00 and under to qualify. Do you really think people who make 83K a year need free medical insurance for their 25 year old child? This is nothing more than a sneaky step by the dems to try and institute universal health care. Notice how they always try to hide their intentions. Why can't they ever just be straight forward about it?
2007-10-17 13:50:54 · answer #5 · answered by That Guy 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Sure she cares, just like we all care about children, but the details and fine print are not what you'll hear about.
Wind her up and watch her work the simpletons into an illogical frenzy. I notice she doesn't mind aborting the poor children either!
2007-10-18 00:54:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think Hillary, like most politicians, cares about power.
2007-10-17 12:36:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
what about GW Bush's veto of increasing the number of children at rish without insurance....I call that pretty uncaring, especially since the Congress has close to the number to over ride the veto...the American people want it and he DECIDES because he's the decider. THe Democrats are mostly blue collar middle classs people...union people and the working poor....she's a democrat and to be a democrat you have to believe that these are your people. If a Republican were to say something like this, i would assume he is joking or just being insincere because he's not getting many votes there anyway.
Not to say you are a dunderhead, but the platform of the Democratic party includes things like health care for the poor, increasing the minimum wage, protecting social security, and increasing workers rights. These things are diametrically opposed to the reality of the way Republicans vote...look at the recent health care increase for poor children and the minimum wage hike...Republican voted in block against them and Hilary and Democrats voted in block for them. You are speaking as a Republican just bashing the Democratrs...Your agrument is lame.
2007-10-17 12:28:50 · answer #8 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 1⤊ 7⤋
No, she does not. Parents that earn 83K a year should be paying for their own health insurance.
2007-10-17 16:38:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
hahahahahahaha!! no....just buying votes.tax payers are btu units that produce $$$$$ she is a socialist/commie.every one will be equally miserable to support the ruling elites!
2007-10-17 12:58:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Doesn't everyone care for the poor children? lololololololol
2007-10-17 12:27:51 · answer #11 · answered by Joe R 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋