English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Here's the question. Your only 3 year old child was kiddnapped.The police have made an arrest.The man they arrested has no respect for human life.He is known to torture and kill his victims.The police have interogated him with no luck.You have the oppuntunity to be alone with the kidnapper.You also have certains means to extract the information you need.Reasoning with him doe's no good.Do you use all the methods at your disposal to find out where your child is or do you take the moral road and let your child die.I know this is a odd question to ask but it has some relavance on what is happening in the world today.

2007-10-17 11:22:59 · 10 answers · asked by Henry B 5 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

I be more specific. They have video's of your child being abducted by this man.Any methods mean ANY methods. Whatever it takes.

2007-10-17 11:40:18 · update #1

10 answers

I can honestly say that I would use ANY and ALL methods at my disposal in an effort to determine the whereabouts of my or ANYONE ELSE'S child, especially if I thought that by doing so I could possibly prevent furthur harm to the child, or give the parents a sense of closure.......

2007-10-17 11:42:56 · answer #1 · answered by bfpmd4077 2 · 1 0

Personally -- my choice would be to get the information out of him, then turn myself in for punishment for what I've done after my child is safe. That's my choice -- and the trade-off that I would make -- someone else can choose differently.

And remember -- in the US, the police can torture someone to get information in a case like this -- however, if they do, they also need to let the person off the hook and and dismiss the charges -- that's the trade-off they have to make.

2007-10-17 18:31:43 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 0

I use every last method, and I'm a creative kind of guy.

It's not my job to keep him safe, I'm under no oath, and I have a duty to my child. The cops have a duty to take me down if they catch me.

2007-10-17 18:28:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Sorry....when it is my child's life on the line there is no high moral ground. Whatever it took to get my child back I would do....simple.

2007-10-17 18:30:33 · answer #4 · answered by malter 5 · 2 0

You can only ask him in such a manner where he had put that someone and then knock him out out ov people views.

2007-10-17 18:47:29 · answer #5 · answered by Really Nome 2 · 0 0

It depends on whether you are absolutely positive and have evidence that he did it. In that case he should be made to talk by any means but not if there is any doubt that he is responsible.

2007-10-17 18:36:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

protect my child! hes an evil man and does not deserve to live on this planet!

2007-10-17 18:30:41 · answer #7 · answered by onesh0t92 1 · 1 0

You let the police handle it. If there is not enough evidence for them to use, there is certainly not enough for you to apply your "certain means"

2007-10-17 18:30:25 · answer #8 · answered by raichasays 7 · 1 1

what sort of persuasion tools are we talking about here?

2007-10-17 18:28:13 · answer #9 · answered by Lavrenti Beria 6 · 0 0

i'd feed you to him

2007-10-17 18:30:14 · answer #10 · answered by Peter P 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers