2007-10-17 10:45:30 · 14 answers · asked by charbatch 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's a toss up really. You have Reid. You have Schumer who, although you can't see his lips moving when Reid speaks, you can see his hand in the back of Reid's suit. You have Durbin, who I believe is a charter member of Al Qaeda. You have Feingold who must have been a Thalidomide baby. You have Levin, with the world's worst combover. You've got Hanoi John who closely resembles Herman Munster but without any of the wit or charm. You have Hillary "I Wouldn't Know the Truth if it Smacked Me Between the Eyes" Clinton. You have Bill Nelson (I hope someone splashes a little water in his face every once in a while) and then there's Fat Teddy. I heard that when Teddy finally slips the mortal veil they're going to use him for the Olympic Torch. With all that alcohol he imbibed, he should burn for about a month.
It kind of makes me wonder why they booted Joe Lieberman. He was about the only one who gave that party a little class.
(Someone needs to tell steven c that Mark Foley wasn't a senator. I know that's hard for some special ed kids to grasp)
2007-10-17 11:10:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
apotheosis of mediocrity goes to Curtis. His policies and lack of action brought about the Great Depression.
Reid is a joke and a jerk, but the worst definetly goes to Curtis.
I wish people read their history more.
2007-10-17 17:53:36 · answer #2 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
lol - this is a real flame thread here.
I think he's irrelevant. I mean, honestly... don't they have better things to do that pass non-binding resolutions condemning Rush Limbaugh and for a Turkish Genocide (that happened and was bad) but happened a long time ago, and only serves to alienate a very important country +70% of our food and supplies to our soldiers in Iraq are flown through Turkish airspace.
Actually - I guess he's not irrelavant, he's more dangerous and incompent.
2007-10-17 17:55:44 · answer #3 · answered by tetrall 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not to my knowledge, but than again I, like most people, do not spend any time studying historical Senate leaders.
2007-10-17 17:48:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
YES
SI
ABSOLUTELY
POSITIVELY
DEAD ON
with the ridiculous grandstanding and posturing, you betcha. in almost fifty years of existance ive never seen someone so reckless and loose cannon with the safety of the united states.
2007-10-17 18:12:06 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes he is>What next will he try to undermine the troops & Sellout the USA for illegals>>
2007-10-17 17:49:49 · answer #6 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nope.
Bill Frist or Trent Lott.
2007-10-17 17:56:45 · answer #7 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He, Murtha, Kennedy and the whole lot of them
2007-10-17 17:52:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
What about Senator Larry Craig trying to have Gay Sex in a Mens Room?
What about Mark Foley trying to have sex with a Congressional page?
2007-10-17 17:48:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
yes
2007-10-17 17:57:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋