Aside from beleiving bush is the son of god, do cons just beleive anything Bush says or does?
Take Iraq for an example. The cons belive the stupid notion that if our soldiers are in Iraq the terrorist will flock to them in Iraq.
Let me get this right- 120,000 U.S. troops are in Iraq. So Al Quada is so stupid they wil go to Iraq and face our militaqry raqther than simply pass go and collect $200 on their way to the U.S. or any where else?
Is that correct? The terrorist are so stupid they wil go to face our military rather than avoid them?
Boy that's increadible. Sure glad Iraq and our military is serving as a "terrorist magnet". I feel safer already.
What's that? oh no attacks since 911? Yeah I know you wanted to mention that. good thing Bush hasn't run any more fake terror attacks lik ehe did on 911. Or Brittian for that matter. wow.
2007-10-17 10:23:49 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I think the screen name should be ex-lax. Patriot Act measures and citizen awareness have made it difficult for the terrorists to strike here...but if you read the news, every now and then one gets turned in or arrested before they can carry out the act of terror.
As far as the terrorists being stupid for fighting our soldiers...yep...and guess what, it don't take a rocket scientist to tie a bomb around yourself and detonate it, either.
2007-10-17 10:34:22 · answer #1 · answered by Yahoo Answer Angel 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Al Quada made iraq its number 1 front in its war on the West and the fact that the US has suffered no other terrorist attacks since 9-11 seems to prove it. Do you have any proof that Bush "ran any fake terror attacks" or are you just a lot of hot air. Far as I can see there is absolutely no evidence to support that statement. Oh and please don't send me any links to those assine groups that purport to have "evidence" that proves 9-11 was an inside job, heard it before. None of its true.
2007-10-17 21:53:41 · answer #2 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you've it right. Now, since pResident Jr. invaded Iraq, under bogus pretenses, we have destabilized the country into becoming a Shiite dominated theocracy with a never ending civil war.
Foreign terrorists don't even need to sneak in. There are plenty of Iraqis who have no qualms about attacking the American occupiers - who seem to be there to help privatise the Iraqi oil reserves. Al Quada seems to be pretty decentralized and can materialize anywhere.
2007-10-17 18:21:04 · answer #3 · answered by planksheer 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This is really not a question you want the right answer to.
It is more like your point of view that you want to sell to someone. Not me.
And, yes...I would much rather have those terrorist in Iran, Syria, Palestine, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan or any country in the Middle East, be over there than any where in the Western Hemisphere.
You have no idea what Homeland Security does or does not do. If you do, you shouldn't be here you should be working with the F.B.I. ?
Like your sarcasm. Here's a little back at ya.
The Woodster
2007-10-17 17:41:49 · answer #4 · answered by woodster 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The terrorists DID show up soon after we removed Saddam from power. Of course it was to recruit the newly upset and bothered people of Iraq. But maybe that is the idea. We create a place for terrorists to be created so we can kill them and keep them from coming here. Now some would say it would be easier to just not create them in the first place, but that isn't fun, is it?
2007-10-17 17:34:28 · answer #5 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We started the terrorists and pull off most of the jobs done and blame the Arabs. They are fighting back with what they have. Any American soldier in Iraq or Afghanistan that wants to make it home alive has to keep their mouth shut about what's really going on over there.What we're being told is a bunch of lies. Any soldier that talks about what's really happening over there comes home in a body bag. We are killing our own to keep our governments dirty little secrets covered up. This is sick.
2007-10-17 19:53:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I guess they think that Al Quada will go to Iraq to keep the American infidels from taking over, or something. But it really does make more sense that they would attack the U.S. while the troops were all in Iraq.
Interesting theory about him faking 9/11. I've heard some people say he was just looking for an excuse to attack Iraq, but would he really go that far?
2007-10-17 17:32:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
We never said they would all go there. We said that they will go there, but they will also continue to try and strike on US soil.
Why is it that you liberal idiots so desperately want to believe that 9/11 was an inside job? I mean do you honestly think that the terrorists are just misunderstood? Why do you hate your country so much?
2007-10-17 17:31:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No. I would like to congratulate you on creating a question completely devoid of even a single fact. That's got to be difficult to accomplish.
2007-10-17 17:39:42 · answer #9 · answered by VoodooPunk 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
"good thing Bush hasn't run any more fake terror attacks lik ehe did on 911"
The more liberals open their mouths.. the more certainty we have of their stupidity.
2007-10-17 17:37:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋