Why do people attack Bush for shooting down a health care bill for children?

Question

He ONLY shot it down because it didn't cover kids enough. He has been a champion for low-income children all his life.

Answer 1

All his life ? Even in his partying days ?

Seriously, can you show prove ? I would like to see some info.

Answer 2

nicely, i've got not got lots appreciate for this guy, as that's. while he nicely-knownshows some thing unacceptable, he 'decrees' it as such. yet while others discover some thing unacceptable, they're blockading and refusing to do what's solid. as an occasion, while the Congress did no longer bypass law to grant money to the troops and not making use of a timetable, which he grew to become down, he claimed that Congress wasn't doing precise and replaced into refusing money to the troops. yet he's the guy who grew to become down the money. i think of that relatively often Bush blames OTHERS for doing issues that are HIS accountability. That being stated, he will say that he's vetoing it for reasons different than giving well being care to little ones. i'm particular he believes that one and all little ones could have well being care. He has different subjects as to HOW the well being care could acquire, and because he's often precise and would possibly never make a mistake, in simple terms his perspectives are proper. i think this u . s . would be lots extra effective off, beginning Jan 20, 2009!

Answer 3

That bill was only ammunition against Bush.
The Democrats knew he would have to veto it, because the bill allowed middle income families(who have health-care already) to use this health care for their kids, therefore instituting socialized medicine, instead of providing only for low income kids.

But in reality, if we took the billion dollars a day we are spending in Iraq, and put it into healthcare, we could provide good health care for every person in America. Priorities are messed up.

Answer 4

They buy into the propaganda that CNN feeds them. The fact is the President vetoed the bill because it was a drastic expansion on the old system. The expansion extends coverage to illegal aliens. It inflates the cost of the program from 35 billion dollars to 110 billion. It extends the eligibility requirements to families that make as much as $80,000 a year instead of the $45,000 that was used prior to the expansion.

It is a sham of a bill, and was rightly vetoed. Nobody wants to keep health care from children but there is absolutely no reason that a family making $80,000 a year can't provide for their own health care.

Answer 5

He shot it down -- and his proposal was for 10% of the coverage -- so, it's hard to find support for your argument as to his reasons, let alone his own statements about why he shot it down.

There are literally thousands of instances where a bill doesn't solve all the problems in a topic, but solves some of them -- vetoing every bill that doesn't solve everything would leave very little legislation as passing. It's just not valid grounds to veto something -- and that's what people are objecting to.

Answer 6

Actually he shot it down because it covered too many kids. The bill included families with 5 kids, making 85,000 per year or less. President Bush felt those kids were too middle class to go to the doctor's office.

Answer 7

You are so right..It is just a political move to make President Bush look bad.He had the children covered that did not have insurance. He vetoed the bill because the demos expanded it to cover children that already have insurance...

Most people just listen to what the liberals say instead of checking it out. Thats why they say stupid things and are in err.Its called getting brainwashed.

I agree with you...

Answer 8

Conservatives only are against the government providing health care to children not the very premise of providing health care as the left would have you stupidly believe. Can you explain why 15 MAJOR SOUTH CALIFORNIA HOSPITALS SHUT DOWN?!?!?!?! There is a health care crisis in Califronia in many parts of the USA where govt has stuck their noses too far in. Health care is a business that HAS to make profits to survive, if they cannot they will open different types of businesses. If govt continues at this rate, you'll have your gardener performing open heart surgery on you at your dinner table.

Anyhow, the dems wanted to bolster spending 300%+ on SCHIPS for families making over $80k/yr??!?!?!

Answer 9

Um actually no. The current system covers 6 million kids. The proposed change, which he shot down, was to cover 30 million kids. The counter proposal from him would cover 5 millions kids. In reality, he wants to cover less kids then the current system.

Answer 10

Yea, that's what I think about when I think about Bush ... happy, healthy kids. As long as they're not in Iraq or New Orleans or their parents own their homes.

Answer 11

He shot it down because they expanded kids to include anyone 25 and under. Sorry, but you stop being a kid when you turn 18.