English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What are your thoughts on what REALLY happened on Spetember 11, 2001? What throws me off the most is that September 10, 2001 was the most active trading day in the history of NYSE. American Airlines' main shareholders were selling like crazy. Coincidence? There are other discrepancies, but this is the one that caught my eye

2007-10-17 09:59:35 · 13 answers · asked by krasnoglaz 3 in Arts & Humanities History

Randy, don't fly off the handle. I'm not making any conclusions, i'm just stating a fact and asking YOU for your opinion.

2007-10-17 10:08:57 · update #1

And i just happened to find it interesting that American Airlines planes are the ones that were used and the day before stock market crashed people were selling big, almost like they were tipped off.

2007-10-17 10:10:50 · update #2

http://cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/09/24/gen.europe.shortselling/

My sources. You guys believe CNN don't you ?

2007-10-17 10:17:23 · update #3

ONCE AGAIN, I'M NOT MAKING CONCLUSIONS, YOU ARE. I'M STATING THE FACT AND ASKING FOR OPINIONS. IDIOTS

2007-10-17 10:18:23 · update #4

UNITED AIRLINES, SORRY

2007-10-17 10:19:45 · update #5

and if you're so sure, do you really have any proof that it was bin laden, aside from some internet video feed? could be easily fabricated, kind of like moon landing

2007-10-17 10:27:24 · update #6

13 answers

I'm not sure about the towers, but the pentagon seems a bit fishy - I mean, experienced pentagon officials (who have been in battlefields) calling up and saying "Yep, definitly a missle, I can smell the cordite from here."

Then there's the lack of wreckage and the fact that the missle/plane hit the only part of the pentagon that was empty AND had undergone structural reinforcing.

But, of course I have know way of knowing - I'm just some bum on the web who's watched too many youtube videos for his own good.

What does worry me however is the lack of explanation provided by the government. If the government isn't in on it, great, but America is supposed to be a democracy, and the government should respond to people's requests for information. Why don't they just release the specific information that people KNOW they have, and quell all of the conspiracy rumours once and for all?

Secondly, regardless of whether or not the US was behind the attacks, the Neocons used the attacks as an excuse to pull off the biggest psychological con in the history of America. I live outside the US and I watch your news - TERROR TERROR TERROR. That's all you guys talk about, and it's become so ingrained in your collective consciousness that you see enemies everywhere, despite the fact that you spend more than the rest of the world combined on weapons.

2007-10-17 16:00:26 · answer #1 · answered by Mr Anon 2 · 0 0

You're reaching for a conclusion with no foundation. You might as well say, did you know that on10 September 2001 no planes flew in the skies over the United States. I guess that this was a conspiracy to get rid of Chem-Trails by blowing up buildings.

Get Real!

Simply read the government report on 9 September 2001 and it answers all of your questions.

2007-10-17 10:05:31 · answer #2 · answered by Randy 7 · 3 0

My problem is with the lack of explanation for some real pressing questions.
Scientifically it has been proved that the towers should not have collapsed, the plane that hit the Pentagon never should have been able to get that close to the building and others too numerous to get into.
People were so emotional that the United States citizenry was ready to believe anything.
And to carry the question a bit further, how did 9/11 equate to Iraq?
Bill Moyer did an excellent program on the selling of the war.
I you remember, anyone who might have disagreed with the war was considered unpatriotic or a traitor.(There's a real telling film clip taken from the Oprah show. A woman disagreed with Oprah and her guess, who were for going to war.I would love to find that woman and give her a great big thumbs up!)
There's an old detective saying.If you want to find out who likely committed a murder,"Follow the money!"
Check out who were the winners after 9/11.
Most people don't want to believe that this government would do such a thing just to have a reason to go to war.Or to go to war just to protect oil resources. But we live in some very corrupt times.
As an old Credence Clearwater Revival song stated "Satan's on the loose!"
We need a four or five hour live television special that would be on every major network and ALL questions would be asked and answered by a panal of impartial scientist, arcitects structure specialist, builders, and whoever else would be needed to give explaination to film clips and other pieces of evidence that go counter to what we have been lead to believe.
Do you think we could get Rupert Murdock in on this? Or is he one of those trying to help with the coverup?!
(Oh Max Smart.That would explain the noise (maybe) but I believe people were referring to the flashes of light that were going off on each floor as the building collasped.)
I love the people that say George Bush is not that smart.
You don't have to be "smart' to pull something such as that off.You just have to be cunning and find the people who are smart.
I mean, he's the president of the United States, right?
That's saying something.

2007-10-17 10:43:24 · answer #3 · answered by robert2011@sbcglobal.net 4 · 1 2

For those who have little faith in the government of this country, conspiracy theories will always prevail. However, for those who are more realistic in their approach to life, there is little time for speculating every aspect of any given situation. It happened, it can happen again because history has a way of repeating itself. The only issue apparent is the fact that there was insufficient information prior to the incident to prevent it.

2007-10-17 10:14:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I don't know, that was all so crazy. Who knows, the government could have been lying about a lot of information....it could have been a million things. I try not to think too far into it just because it didn't directly affect me. I sure am sorry for all those innocent people who died though. What a sucky thing!

2007-10-17 10:31:23 · answer #5 · answered by Pretty Maggie Money Eyes 7 · 0 0

Unusual stock and option transactions were already investigated and were found to be ordinary transactions resulting from well-known business expectations. This was done by the 9-11 Commission & others (See Point 6, at:

http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=pubs-english&y=2006&m=August&x=20060828133846esnamfuaK0.2676355

Furthermore, financial transactions are completely transparent: We know exactly who did them. Only a fool would simply buy 10s of millions of put options (anything less would not be worth it) and then go blow up the WTC--we would know immediately who did it.

Moreover, insider-trading is a crime and the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) routinely monitors all trades for excess profits. There’s no way to cover it up.
-------------------------------
Actually, it has been utterly proven that the jets, and nothing else, collapsed the towers. See
-- The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057
It’s useful to see the investigation team & their credentials at: http://www.asce.org/responds/wtc_team.cfm

-- Scientific American. See
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000

-- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. See http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

--FEMA: http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/mat_fema403.shtm

--NIST (National Institute on Science and Technology):
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

-- Popular Mechanics published a huge article attacking the conspiracy nuts using over 300 renowned experts in http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

-- World experts in demolition have attacked the 9-11 conspiracy theory

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

--PBS/NOVA http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/

-- Purdue (http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html), and others

-- Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that was running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives during the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html

http://www.debunking911.com/ProgressiveCollapseWTC-6-23-2006.pdf

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,,2166832,00.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the Pentagon:
1. There are numerous photographs of large pieces of the plane, many of these were published in the newspapers. Here’s a nice picture:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=6#bigplane
(scroll down after clicking)

The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

The report describes the wreckage and where it was found.

For example, on page 26 it says:

“The remains of most of the passengers on the aircraft were found near the end of the travel of the aircraft debris. The front landing gear (a relatively solid and heavy object) and the flight data recorder (which had been located near the rear of the aircraft) were also found nearly 300 ft into the structure. By contrast, the remains of a few individuals (the hijacking suspects), who most likely were near the front of the aircraft, were found relatively close to the aircraft’s point of impact with the building."

ADDITIONALLY - Many workers in the Pentagon were killed, more than in the plane that hit it. (125 people died in the pentagon, 64 on the plane)

2007-10-17 12:32:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

1. Cite your source.
2. Cite your source.

2007-10-17 10:12:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They say you're not paranoid if the black helicopters really are after you! Honestly though, you can't be serious to think it was anybody other bin Laden and Al Qaeda. If you want to blame someone other than a godless terrorist, blame Clinton. He had multiple opportunites to have bin Laden handed over to him, and each time he declined.

2007-10-17 10:11:53 · answer #8 · answered by Bill 5 · 0 1

George Bush did not conspire the atrocities of 9/11. He isn't that smart.

2007-10-17 10:08:01 · answer #9 · answered by jaden404 4 · 1 1

Well, I'm sick and tired of hearing people say it was a conspiracy masterminded by Bush.

Bush can't even string a sentence together properly, let alone devise a conspiracy.

2007-10-17 10:14:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers