Just elect Hilary Clinton.
2007-10-17 09:50:25 · 16 answers · asked by ahedou2 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This moment in Childish Exaggeration brought to you by Republican stupidity.
2007-10-17 09:55:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 12⤋
Instead of people debating whether or not to raise or lower taxes, why aren't people complaining about the reforming government and not wasting the billions of dollars they waste on a regular basis?
And no, I'm not talk about the war in Iraq, all entitlements you don't like, or all the social programs you don't understand. I mean the"little" perks your Congressman gives himself, the useless projects being authorized just to get votes, and what ever else they do.
Candidates will spend nearly a billion dollars running for President this time around. Do you think they really have a grasp on how to spend your money?
Tax Freedom this year was April 30 2007(link below). Know what that means? You worked for four months to pay your taxes. One third or your income went to taxes. All I want is for them to stop! That's enough. How come no candidate is running on such a platform?
2007-10-17 22:18:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Over taxation has ruined many civilizations, but Hillary doesn't learn from her mistakes...her and Hubie just mysteriously make 'mistakes" disappear.... Like the 911 evidence Where original documents were stolen before the commission could get a hold of it!.... who NOW is asked to be part of her consultation team and is a known criminal!.
...agree, when everyone becomes wards of the state because we have all lost our Initiative to Work to pay for the Worthless that are complacent in receiving a government check....I guess someone like Hillary will be happy ...she will be the Death of this country!...or maybe already is!
2007-10-17 19:54:49 · answer #3 · answered by Rada S 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You dont think they would be willing to go over 110% after that? Think about it, right now they demand a percentage of make-believe tip dollars. Maybe the service worker makes that specific amount of tips, and maybe they dont, but the government assumes they do and wants a percentage of an assumed number.
So the Democrats could apply the same reasoning even beyond 100%. They could assume you really make more than is reported, and add an additional 10% or whatever, above what your total reported income is. There really is no bottom here.
2007-10-17 17:20:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Might as well. We'll be selling our souls to the government regardless of which Democrat is mysteriously elected as it is.
2007-10-17 16:56:58 · answer #5 · answered by Emma 6 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Cool. does this mean the government will pay my mortgage and car payments, too?
2007-10-17 19:28:45 · answer #6 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is "progressing" forward with that goal. We will all have to "tolerate" it. Im sure she see's it as "fairness", maybe later on, we will all be "enlightened"... or....maybe not..
2007-10-18 00:17:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Let's rather pay no taxes at all!
2007-10-18 03:17:15 · answer #8 · answered by vkrioukov 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Be patient - the Democrats are working hard to achieve this goal!
2007-10-17 16:55:49 · answer #9 · answered by LadySable 6 · 9⤊ 1⤋
That sounds childishly melodramatic to me.
2007-10-18 00:37:02 · answer #10 · answered by BOOM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I will miss the fiscal responsibility that this republican administration gave us for all of these years.
2007-10-17 16:54:50 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋