2007-10-17 08:42:44 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Because he'd rather spend $2 billion a week on the stupid war in Iraq.
2007-10-17 08:59:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
obviously there are toddlers that pass hungry in this usa. Why do you imagine there are nutrition banks in each and every single position? 2d Harvest case in point. there's a sparkling style of human beings in this usa noted as the operating poor. those who artwork very confusing and yet somewhat scrape by technique of because the price of living is so extreme. human beings are paying more suitable than 1/2 their salaries for lease or more suitable in some places. upload that to the extreme value of gas and staples like milk and also you'll see what the placement is like. And BTW the existence of those nutrition banks does no longer mean there aren't any hungry human beings. there have been memories, rather around the holidays, of ways a number of those nutrition banks in basic terms won't be able to save up with the decision for.
2016-10-21 08:01:11 · answer #2 · answered by homrich 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush did no such thing.
Tell me though... I'm curious what you are doing to keep 7 million American children from going to bed hungry tonight?
To be sure, Bush can't do any more than you.
This is a local issue -- and has very little to do with national politics.
2007-10-17 08:50:34 · answer #3 · answered by RedThread 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Why are you blaming the president for hungry children when there are local officials who do nothing to help the children in their jurisdiction. Some children are hungry because their parents are crackheads and dope addicts. There is a lot of blame to go around not just Bush. What do you propose he do? Congress controls the money in the US.
2007-10-17 08:49:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Because he is too busy making 10 million Iraqi kids go to bed hungry.
2007-10-17 09:12:37 · answer #5 · answered by Worried in Bolingbrook 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Per the Constitution, that's not within the federal government's purview.
Per James Madison, "father of the Constitution", charity is not a function of the federal government.
Or don't you like Constitutional rule of law?
2007-10-17 08:53:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Are you telling me he's not signing that Bill???
You know, the one that supports kids over age 24 who's parents knock down $80,000/yr minimum?
2007-10-17 08:47:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
If you believe the false premise it would be because he isn't their parent.
2007-10-17 08:48:24 · answer #8 · answered by sfavorite711 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Because he's not Santa claus?
2007-10-17 08:46:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
yes and they are dying like fruit flys every day !!
2007-10-17 08:49:05 · answer #10 · answered by seawolf 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋