2007-10-17 08:31:54 · 7 answers · asked by ? 6 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
umm,ok so if I go to make a dress,or building,it need a pattern or plan,then often a form is used to present the final object,in rough or miniature.Like one may use a dress form to make it fit to spec>and I think I'm kinda lost now,so is it vice versa?
2007-10-17 19:40:27 · answer #1 · answered by t_blond_chick 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Function has to follow form. You would have to have form before you could possibly function. Form is to create or to mold a particular pattern and you would have to have the form before you could function because function is power or the performance of a duty.
2007-10-17 15:50:26 · answer #2 · answered by craft painter 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's a little bit of both. If you have a particular 'function' to be performed, it does sort of dictate the nature of the 'tool' you'll need. OTOH I've heard it said that, "If the only tool you have is a hammer, pretty soon all of your problems start looking like nails." âº
Doug
2007-10-17 16:32:15 · answer #3 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they evolve together. changes in form will make something function better. If you require something to function in a particular way, then you shape its form.
weelchairs, prosthetics, cars, cell phones...you can use anything to analyze this question
2007-10-17 15:44:11 · answer #4 · answered by ladyjeansntee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
whoah, luv. sometimes Ur just too heavy first thing in the AM... i need to move my form before i am able to function.
2007-10-18 08:05:51 · answer #5 · answered by drizzle_darkened 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know, I surmise that it's entirely possible for things to happen in conjunction : /
2007-10-17 16:37:07 · answer #6 · answered by craukymuvilla 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The former i believe
2007-10-18 04:34:19 · answer #7 · answered by †100% Angel† 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋