Fred turned out to be a dudd, and Giuliani is starting to lose steam....
2007-10-17 08:00:03 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Go Romney....
2007-10-17 08:24:08 · answer #1 · answered by Brittney G 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Not necessarily. No voting has occured yet, and a lot can change between now and the national convention. Just have to wait to see what happens in the early states and see who has the momentum, and even then, if some skeleton comes out of the closet or if someone makes a big gaffe, whoever is leading and fall quickly--and that goes for the democratic candidates as well.
2007-10-17 08:11:34 · answer #2 · answered by chaos_agent_sd 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Romney isnt leading anything, he's in 3rd and falling, he cant even raise money, last quarter of the $18 million he claimed he raised, he actaully kicked in $10 million of his own cash
Poll Averages - Republicans
Rudy Giuliani 28.2%
Fred Thompson 18.7%
Mitt Romney 12.7%
John McCain 12.3%
2007-10-17 08:10:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I wish he would have the guts to overpower Hillary like Rudy can. I wonder why Rudy is losing steam anyway?
Rudy is the only republican I know who will win the election over Hillary. I highly doubt Mitt Romney can win against the socialist lady.
2007-10-17 09:12:56 · answer #4 · answered by I hate Hillary Clinton 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who knows?
Romney and Giuliani are both RINOs.
For the life of me, I cannot understand why they are the leading GOP candidates.
Huckabee and McCain have conservative credentials at least, but neither seems to have a chance.
And Ron Paul is the only old-school conservative in the pack.
2007-10-17 08:08:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
John McCain is by far the best man for the job. This is one man in touch with war and rumors of war. Have you seen his medals and decorations? He is a professional when it comes to all governmental agencies.
He is against abortion and homosexual marriage.
He is an Episcopalian who disagrees with homosexual bishops within the church.
If we can't have a General, then at least a war hero who knows what our men are doing over in Iraq. He has served this country in the Armed Services and in government. This man is truly deserving of the job.
Don't worry about the economy. The American people take care of it. Make sure you find a man who can protect this country.
2007-10-17 08:45:22 · answer #6 · answered by Jeancommunicates 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Herman Cain is a fool's shaggy dog tale, a patsy, and a turn-flopping sellout. below no circumstances smart or a destiny chief; comparable is going for the two Mittens and Parry; Bachman is basically too zealous in her evaluations to formulate a important concept till now expressing it; Santorum is a common follower that believes too a great number of what he's informed with out pausing to think of it by; Huntsman became into employed by potential of Obama at one element, who's the only maximum consistent bell-climate for undesirable workers alternatives, and by potential of evaluation all of us concept Bush Jr became into quite retarded...; Newt is the purest form of a RINO interior the entire race; ...And Ron Paul, who's the ideal selection won't %. a combat to shield trouble-free insurance even whilst all media components blatantly worry what question Obama could could answer if Ron Paul might desire to paintings up the braveness to voice them. i'm no longer tying down my destiny investments in this usa till I see corrupt loopholes closed, the government get out of the industry's way (letting all failed companies fall no count the names of their government shills because it quite is the full element to a company), and letting me choose out of loosing money interior the compelled investment device referred to as Social secure practices. And getting the masses to as quickly as lower back purchase into an "American Dream" is the only component which will make our usa proceed to exist, no longer to point prosper
2016-10-09 10:18:52 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
huh is he the new flavor of the weak ? the three listed in your question have already given up the nomination to hillary -they are non-factors being they are associated with continue as bushies - I am voting for ron paul the only republican who has a chance to beat her becausehis platform is very different from bushes and better than hillarys(which is Iraq under democratic mgmnt)and bigger govt
2007-10-17 08:23:06 · answer #8 · answered by rooster 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I hope so, I would rather vote for Romney than for Giuliani.
2007-10-17 08:03:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Hope not That would bring us closer to another Clinton administration, Cigars for evevryone.
2007-10-17 08:35:42 · answer #10 · answered by frank 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Romney will turn around in the polls, soon enough
2007-10-18 07:00:40 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋