There's some things that you just can't expect a human to do.
2007-10-17 08:08:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
This question is just as tasteless as the question I saw about Heterosexual women mating with Rush Limbaugh for guaranteed world peace. How dare Clinton's name be used for a post in the same way that Limbaugh's is.
I think both this poster and the poster of that other question are independents.
2007-10-17 15:14:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Michael M 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question should be, would Hillary Clinton mate with a man if it would bring peace?
2007-10-17 15:05:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by mikey 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
For world peace???? Yeah, I'd take one for the team. Maybe I could get one of those awards like Gore got for my act of generosity and courage.
2007-10-17 15:09:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by jmmy_crackscorn 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't do much for world peace. I would be out of a job.
2007-10-17 15:02:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
You GOPs really do have sexual fantasies about her. Who would have thought that all of the Republican's anti-American hate speech would be to hide their lust?
The Lord works in mysterious ways.
2007-10-17 15:07:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by buffytou 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
You're presuming that conservative heterosexual men actually WANT world peace?
2007-10-17 15:06:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I certainly would… I’d even put on a blue dress!
Not sayin’ she’s a MILF or anything, but I do enjoy a woman who goes after what she wants.
2007-10-17 15:46:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes
Right after that I would castrate myself, poke out my eyes and wander the in mind field.
2007-10-17 15:12:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If it meant world peace I might even do her myself.
2007-10-17 15:12:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Enigma 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I would have to be ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN that world peace was at stake, and then I'd take one for the country.
2007-10-17 15:01:04
·
answer #11
·
answered by Zardoz 7
·
3⤊
1⤋